Page 364 - The Engineering Guide to LEED-New Construction Sustainable Construction for Engineers
P. 364

A S y s t e m a t i c V i e w o f G r e e n a n d M i n i m u m P r o g r a m Re q u i r e m e n t s   325

             LEED process. Regardless, as long as there is consistency and a smooth transition from the
             main contacts throughout the project life, the process should work well.
                 So what needs to be done to make sure that the LEED clearinghouse contact is adequately
             involved in all stages of the project? Communication, communication, communication! It is
             not necessary to call special meetings with the green contact all the time that might add to
             the project schedule and costs. It is necessary, however, that this person be included on all
             meeting and important decision correspondence. Then on a periodic basis it is helpful to
             have a portion of a meeting or a special charrette dedicated to the LEED process. This can
             be done simply by adding the green contact person to the project team meetings and
             including a section on LEED in construction and other meetings, such as is done with QA/
             QC. The project checklist with credit estimates as portrayed in Tables 1.2.3 or 8.1.2 is a good
             example of a document that should be updated by the green contact person and distributed
             to all project team members frequently throughout a project.
                 The really important part is that the entire project be looked upon as a system and
             the green credits be interpreted as a package. It has been found that if individual
             entities each evaluate specific credits, there is a tendency to add or delete credits based
             on limited economic and/or environmental perspectives. This may lead to going green
             becoming an added cost to a project. However, if credits are evaluated in a systemwide
             manner with many project features clustered to obtain multiple credits and
             environmental goals, then this reduces the costs of construction and the project. The
             only way that this can be done effectively is to always have one green lead, or “director
             of sustainability” as others may wish to call the person, for a project at any time. Any
             transfers of personnel for this position must be done well and comprehensively.

             Miscellaneous
             There will be many additional rules of thumb developed to aid in the green process as the
             green rating systems become more prevalent. However, already several suggestions can be
             made based on past experiences. The best way to learn about many of these is to stay
             informed about green building and, with respect to the LEED rating system, become
             familiar with the CIRs and other documents available. Some additional suggestions are
             listed in the following sections.
             Preliminary Site Assessment
             Many existing site features can impact the green decisions that are made. Having a standard
             questionnaire or template for preliminary site assessment that includes questions about these
             features can be a useful tool. Including a summary of these features on the documents in all
             phases of the project, including project conceptualization, may facilitate a more efficient and
             economical incorporation of sustainability into the project. Some of the items include
                  •  Prevailing wind direction
                  •  Building rotation
                  •  Neighboring shading features such as foliage and buildings
                  •  Floodplain locations
                  •  Wetlands, streams, rock outcroppings, and other natural features
                  •  Soil types
                  •  Existing on-site vegetation
   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369