Page 113 - The Green Building Bottom Line The Real Cost of Sustainable Building
P. 113

92  CHAPTER 3



                     1 Assign resources.
                     2 Design a GHG inventory.
                     3 Collect data.
                     4 Calculate emissions.
                     5 Set target.
                     6 Reduce emissions.
                     7 Report results.

                     WRI also has free software tools (available at www.ghgprotocol.org) that help quan-
                     tify the emissions from fuel used in facilities, electricity purchases, business travel,
                     and employee commuting.
                       The main difference between the two programs is that the WRI program has a do-
                     it-yourself structure, which eases some of the external reporting requirements and
                     gives a bit more flexibility. The Climate Leaders program is a bit more demanding,
                     calling for a more significant allocation of a company’s time, money, and human
                     resources, but it offers personal tech support, recognition, and bi-annual conferences
                     for sharing best practices and networking. Both programs are helpful tools to begin the
                     process of establishing a carbon footprint and establishing reduction goals.
                       At Melaver, Inc., we chose to join the Climate Leaders Partnership to help with our
                     footprint analysis. We then took a hard look at our business operations to see where
                     emissions came from, which ones we could measure, and which ones we were respon-
                     sible for. Our analysis showed we were emitting greenhouse gases from three primary
                     areas: electricity used to power our offices, business travel (both ground and air), and
                     the staff’s commutes to the office. While the company does not dictate where employ-
                     ees live or how they get to work, we did claim responsibility for commuting as part of
                     our comprehensive carbon footprint.
                       To determine our footprint based on these three areas required collecting some basic
                     information:

                     ■ For electricity, the total annual electric bill for each of our offices.
                     ■ For business travel, the total miles driven on company business, total miles flown,
                       and vehicle fuel efficiency.
                     ■ For commuting, the frequency, distance of commute, and fuel efficiency for each
                       employee’s vehicle.

                       Many organizations have this information already. And after establishing a bench-
                     marking process, systems can easily be put into place to facilitate data collection
                     on an ongoing basis. For example, Melaver, Inc.’s electric bills were already on file
                     through accounts payable. This held true for business travel as well, since in order to
                     be reimbursed, mileage and flight information must be turned in. To assemble com-
                     mute information, a brief survey asking employees to list their vehicle, fuel efficiency,
                     round trip commute in miles, and how many days per week this trip is made. (Carpool-
                     ing and public transportation are excluded from the calculations.) Larger organizations
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118