Page 246 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 246

232   P r o c e s s   C o n t r o l                                  S u p p l y   C h a i n   M a n a g e m e n t    233


                                the  first  shipments,  which  should  be  numbered  and  accompanied  by
                                results of the vendor’s quality inspection and test results. Verify that the
                                ven dor has correctly checked each important characteristic and that your
                                results agree, or “correlate” with his. Finally, keep a running history of
                                quality  performance.  The  best  predictor  of  future  good  performance
                                seems to be a record of good performance in the past. If you are a sub-
                                scriber to GIDEP, the Government Industry Data Exchange Program, you
                                have access to a wealth of data on many suppliers. (GIDEP subscribers
                                must  also  contribute  to  the  data  bank.)  The  Coordinated  Aerospace
                                Supplier Evaluation (CASE) database for the aviation industry is another
                                useful resource. If relevant to your application, these compilations of the
                                experience and audits of a large number of companies can be a real money-
                                and time-saver.



                      Vendor Quality Planning

                                Vendor  quality  planning  involves  efforts  directed  toward  preventing
                                quali ty problems, appraisal of product at the vendor’s plant as well as
                                at  the  buyer’s  place  of  business,  corrective  action,  disposition  of  non-
                                conforming merchan dise, and quality improvement. The process usually
                                begins in earnest after a particular source has been selected. Most pre-
                                award evaluation is general in nature; after the vendor has been selected
                                it is time to get down to the detailed level.
                                   A first step in the process is the transmission of the buyer’s require-
                                ments to the vendor. Even if the preliminary appraisal of the vendor’s capa-
                                bility indicated that the vendor could meet your requirements, it is important
                                that the requirements be studied in detail again before actual work begins.
                                Close con tact is required between the buyer and the vendor to ensure that
                                the  require ments  are  clearly  understood.  The  vendor’s  input  should  be
                                solicited; could a change in requirements help them produce better-quality
                                parts?
                                   Next it is necessary to work with the vendor to establish procedures for
                                inspection, test, and acceptance of the product. How will the product be
                                inspected? What workmanship standards are to be applied? What in-pro-
                                cess testing and inspection are required? What level of sampling will be
                                employed? These and similar questions must be answered at this stage. It is
                                good practice to have the first few parts completely inspected by both the
                                vendor and the buyer to ensure that the vendor knows which features must
                                be checked as well as how to check them. The buyer may want to be at the
                                vendor’s facility when production first begins.
                                   Corrective action systems must also be developed. Many companies
                                have their own forms, procedures, etc., for corrective action. If you want
                                your sys tem to be used in lieu of the vendor’s corrective action system,
                                the vendor must be notified. Bear in mind that the vendor may need








          11_Pyzdek_Ch11_p227-240.indd   233                                                            11/9/12   5:13 PM
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251