Page 89 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 89

76    I n t e g r a t e d   P l a n n i n g                                                                                                                               S t r a t e g i c   P l a n n i n g    77


                                   Despite the admonition to “consider your internal customer,” many
                                depart ments still behave as if they’re in a “silo” by themselves. They pay
                                lip service to the idea, but for a variety of reasons they don’t practice it
                                very well. Their focus remains inward, on individual measures of perfor-
                                mance and efficiency. Most efforts are spent improving the links of the
                                supply  chain,  with  little  effort  devoted  to  the  linkages,  or  interfaces
                                between links, and the operation of the chain as a whole.

                                Systems Thinking
                                What these companies failed to appreciate was that a higher level of think-
                                ing was needed: systems thinking. Once the quality of individual processes
                                is put reasonably well into line, other factors emerge to warrant attention.
                                Consider the analogy of a football team.
                                   Major professional sports spend a lot of time and money on process
                                improvement, even though they probably don’t look at it that way. A team
                                owner can spend millions on a contract for a star quarterback. By apply-
                                ing natural talent, they expect to “improve the passing process.” But in
                                many cases, the touchdowns don’t appear, despite the huge sums spent
                                on star quar terbacks. At some point in the “process failure mode effects
                                analysis,” the coaches discover it’s impossible for this highly valued quar-
                                terback to complete passes from flat on his back. They find that the offen-
                                sive line needs shoring up. Or a good blocking back is needed, or a better
                                game plan, or any number of other factors.
                                   The point is that any organization, like a football team, succeeds or
                                fails as a complete system, not as a collection of isolated, independent
                                parts or processes. In the same way that a motion picture clip tells us
                                much more about a situation than an instantaneous snapshot, systems
                                thinking gives us a clearer picture of the whole organizational dynamic.
                                In The Fifth Discipline (Senge, 1990), Peter Senge proposes that the only
                                sustainable competitive advantage comes from transforming a company
                                into a “learning organiza tion.” The keys to doing this, Senge maintains,
                                are five basic disciplines that every organization striving for success must
                                master: systems thinking, person al mastery, mental models, building a
                                shared vision, and team learning. Guess which one he considers the most
                                important. Though he numbers it fifth, he lists it first, and he titled his
                                book after it.

                                System Optimization versus Process Improvement
                                If one “thinks system,” the question inevitably arises: What do we do
                                with process improvement? Do we ignore it now that we’re thinking at
                                a higher level? No, process improvement is still important. It consti-
                                tutes the building blocks upon which system performance is based. But
                                like  the  football  team  alluded  to  above,  once  you  have  a  “star  per-
                                former” at every position, you have a challenge of a different sort: coor-
                                dinating  and  synchronizing  the  efforts  of  every  component  in  the








          05_Pyzdek_Ch05_p061-102.indd   76                                                             11/9/12   5:04 PM
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94