Page 68 - The McKinsey Mind
P. 68

02 (031-048B) chapter 2  1/29/02  4:49 PM  Page 45






                               Designing the Analysis                                      45


                                   Responsibility is mostly self-evident. After all, someone has to
                               take charge of each analysis, or it won’t get done. We’ll cover the
                               question of how you assign the right people to the right tasks (and
                               get them on your team in the first place) in Chapter 6, “Manag-
                               ing Your Team.” Usually, it makes sense to parcel out responsibil-
                               ity for discrete chunks of the analysis (e.g., for each subissue) to
                               one person, but it’s not a requirement. Thus, in our example, Tom
                               is in charge of answering the question “Does the new process
                               require special facilities?” Belinda is on the hook for finding out
                               whether we can acquire any special facilities that we might need,
                               but one piece of that analysis goes to Terry. Why? As it happens,
                               Terry is our financial expert and is building an overall financial
                               model for the project, so it makes sense for Terry to analyze the
                               rate of return.
                                   Due date, once again, is self-explanatory. Being specific about
                               dates helps the members of your team understand what is expected
                               of them and allows you to visualize the overall flow of the project
                               from start to finish. Some people like to track their due dates in
                               more detail with Gantt charts or other project management tools.
                               That’s up to you.
                                   In our example, one analysis more or less dovetails neatly with
                               the next. Bear in mind, however, that sometimes the results of one
                               analysis will make a whole range of subsequent analyses redun-
                               dant, thus saving you the trouble of actually performing them. For
                               instance, if the analyses prove our initial hypothesis that we don’t
                               need special facilities, then the question of whether we can acquire
                               them—and all the attendant analyses—falls away. Thus, if you can,
                               you should schedule your analyses to let you answer these “domi-
                               nant” questions first. Of course, sometimes you don’t have the lux-
                               ury to wait for the results of one analysis before you start the next.
                               Still, make the most of opportunities to prune your analysis plan
                               aggressively.
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73