Page 105 - The Resilient Organization
P. 105

92                   Part Three: Step 2. Building Resilience into the Organization


          MAKING RESILIENCE A NATURAL ACCOMPANIMENT
          TO THE ORGANIZATIONAL DAY


          Therefore, I propose making the organization—rather than its leadership—
          resilient. Instead of relying solely on the leader’s capacity (whether it’s a
          CEO or a head of government) to take preemptive or corrective action in
          time, the organization should be imbued with resilience capability. Such
          resilience building still requires some intention and determination on every-
          one’s part (including the leader), but when resilience is a natural accompa-
          niment to organizational activities, it becomes everyone’s responsibility.
          Also, turning threats into opportunities on a daily basis is much more effec-
          tive (and perhaps continuously rewarding) than doing so when the corpo-
          ration is at the end of its success run. Such continuous action also makes
          resilience a real-life, everyday capability rather than an abstract concept
          that is to be invoked at the times of crisis. When the crisis hits, it is not at
          all given that the resilience capability is there to be galvanized, unless it has
          been frequently enough rehearsed. (It is like assuming that you can outrun
          the tiger, should the need arise, without testing the matter ahead of time,
          before encountering the very tiger you ought to be running away from.
          Well, not many people live to tell their success story.) It is good to battle
          train before the battle.
             Resilience building concerns five dimensions that make strong and
          imaginative organizations: organizational intelligence, resourcing,
          design, adaptation, and culture (or  sisu, a Finnish word suggesting
          tenacity):


            1. Organizational intelligence: Organizations are intelligent when they
               successfully accommodate multiple voices and diverse thought.
            2. Resourcing: Organizations are resourceful when they manage to
               mitigate change or even better, use resource scarcity for innovative
               breakthroughs.
            3. Design: Organizations are robustly designed when their structural
               characteristics support resilience and avoid systemic traps.
            4. Adaptation: Organizations are adaptive and fit when they rehearse
               change.
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110