Page 123 - The Toyota Way Fieldbook
P. 123

100                       THE TOYOTA WAY FIELDBOOK


        Pull in a Custom Manufacturing Environment

        Because of the simple model (see Figure 5-8), which is based upon the produc-
        tion of the same three models of parts again and again, many people believe
        that pull in a high-variety or custom production environment is not possible.
        This is based on the incorrect assumption that when Operation C produces a
        specific model, they will send a “pull signal” to the preceding operation (B) to
        make a replacement for that same model. Operation C uses a “1” and Operation
        B makes a replacement version of “1.”
            What if you have thousands of possible items and some may be used only once
        per month? In a high-variety, high-mix, or custom production situation the instruc-
        tion on what to produce next (the custom order) would be given to Operation A
        rather than C. After completion, Operation A passes the part to Operation B. Then
        Operation B would work on this part, complete it, and pass it to Operation C. In
        this manner the work “flows through” the subsequent operations. Remember that
        flow and pull are not the same thing. The common assumption is that the work
        must be pushed to Operation B and Operation C if the instruction to produce is pro-
        vided to the beginning of the line (Operation A).
            Look back at the distinctions between push and pull. The first element is a
        defined agreement between the two parties. Is there a defined agreement between
        Operation A and Operation B in a custom production situation? Yes, it is still
        one piece of work in process. The second element requires that the location be
        defined in accordance with the agreement and then dedicated. The space is ded-
        icated just as in the previous example. The third element requires a method to
        control the production to satisfy the agreement (the standard). How is the pro-
        duction controlled? It is controlled the same way—visually.
            What is the difference? The only difference is in the agreement of “what the
        customer wants.” In this case, the quantity is the same, but what about the model?
        The customer processes (B and C) do not dictate the specific model produced by
        their supplier. The agreement is that each operation produces the next product
        in the same sequence presented by the preceding operation. This is referred to as
        “sequenced pull” or “sequenced flow.”
            Figure 5-9, below, shows sequenced flow production for a high product vari-
        ety situation. Operation A receives the schedule, and has previously produced a
        Model 2, Model 1, and another Model 2; and the next item on the schedule is
        Model 3. Since there is an open space between Operation A and Operation B, A
        has permission to produce the next item on the schedule. The rules of pull are
        still followed in that Operation A would not produce if the space were full. The
        rule states that an operation can complete the part in process if the customer
        space is full, but will not pass the part to the space. The part will remain in the
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128