Page 285 - The Toyota Way Fieldbook
P. 285

260                       THE TOYOTA WAY FIELDBOOK


        Management was taking a top-down culture with poorly trained employees,
        giving them “micro-waved” problem-solving training, and suddenly expecting
        miraculous projects selected by the workers.
            Quality Circles have never been a fad at Toyota. They have been an ongoing
        management tool for productivity and quality improvement for decades and are
        still considered a sign of a highly evolved Toyota Production System (TPS)
        organization. In this regard the American Toyota sites are still developing.
            Participation in Quality Circles is voluntary, but many people at Toyota choose
        to participate because they want to take part in improving the work area. Quality
        Circles are a good method to improve quality, and make other improvements,
        and are also an excellent activity to promote teamwork and develop the capa-
        bilities of individuals. Each member of the circle is responsible for fulfilling each
        role on the team, such as taking minutes, keeping the meeting on time, or facil-
        itating the meeting. Ateam leader usually leads the circle, but team members may
        elect to lead a circle as a development opportunity. The leader is responsible for
        establishing desired outcomes with management, planning each meeting, clearly
        setting expectations for the team, and coordinating activities with others, such
        as engineering and maintenance.
            The circle is responsible for setting goals and meeting schedules, but the group
        leader acts in an advisory capacity. The primary role of the group leader is to ensure
        that the circle is addressing a meaningful issue (one that will improve the team or
        group) and that time is spent wisely and productively. He or she will check in with
        the facilitator weekly for an update and to provide any necessary support or guid-
        ance. The team is allotted one paid hour (overtime pay) per week (each person) for
        meeting and any assignment activity. The team may elect to meet before or after
        work, or in some cases during a working lunch. Most circles deal with issues in the
        work area so many meetings are conducted at the actual work site (gemba).
            At the completion of an activity, the circle group prepares a short presentation
        for management explaining the activity and the results. This presentation is
        primarily a congratulatory opportunity for management to express gratitude to
        the team for their effort and work to improve the operation. Any suggestions
        implemented by the circle also qualify for a payment award in the suggestion sys-
        tem program (see below). In this case the members are paid for their time during
        the meetings and for the improvement ideas. Each year the best Quality Circle
        projects are selected for bronze, silver, gold, and platinum awards and make for-
        mal presentations to vice presidents of Toyota. The American plants each select a
        platinum award winner to present in Japan at Toyota’s international Quality Circle
        conference. At Georgetown in 2004 there were about 22 percent of employees in
        voluntary circles, compared to a target in the 40 to 50 percent range. Participation
        of over 80 percent is not uncommon in Japan. This is a good opportunity to
        develop and use abilities and to be rewarded for the effort. Not a bad deal at all.
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290