Page 124 - How Great Leaders Build Abundant Organizations That Win
P. 124

WHOM DO I TRAVEL WITH? (RELATIONSHIPS AND TEAMS [TH]AT WORK)



           Fortunately, as we come to value the human element at
        work, some of the old rules about not fraternizing are start-
        ing to soften a bit. When research suggests that people
        with at least one really good friend at work are more apt to
        like their job and stick with it, friendship at work becomes
        an asset rather than a liability. Research by the Gallup
        Organization reveals that employees who have a best friend
        at work are seven times more likely to be highly engaged at
        work than those who do not. Those with a close friend at
        work are almost twice as likely to be satisfied with their pay,
        and that number stretches to three times as likely for those
        in the lowest-paying jobs. People with close friends at work
        are 27 percent more likely to see their strengths as aligned
        with the company’s goals. These friendship claimers are also
        statistically more likely to satisfy customers, get more done
        in less time, have more fun on the job, have fewer accidents
        at work, innovate and share ideas more, and simply show up
        more consistently. Those with three or more close friends
        at work report even more increases in work and life satisfac-
        tion.  While work friendships can create problems as well,
             2
        the advantages of having strong friendships and good rela-
        tionships at work seem to far outweigh the disadvantages.
           Effective leaders play an important role in helping subor-
        dinates make friends, build strong teams, resolve conflicts,
        get along with customers, and build relationships of trust,
        support, and  abundance  throughout the organization.
        Effective leaders also reap the benefits of personal engage-
        ment and satisfaction when they have close friends at work.
           One plant manager who was worried about abysmal
        scores on employee engagement measures (along with
        high customer complaints, high absenteeism, a poor safety
        record, and low overall plant performance) decided she had


                                   105
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129