Page 50 - How Great Leaders Build Abundant Organizations That Win
P. 50

THE MAKING OF ABUNDANCE


        in a wide variety of even unpleasant circumstances. Not-
        so-good news: we have to work at this meaning-making
        process. It takes work to determine what work means, at
        either a corporate or a personal level. Leaders have the pri-
        mary responsibility for this meaning-making process.
           At a personal level, inner dialogues shape and construct
        this meaning. If I tell myself I’m not paid well because I’m
        not respected for my skills, I build a different meaning than
        if I tell myself how glad I am to work for an organization
        that is fiscally responsible. If I tell myself my boss’s criticism
        means he is trying to help me improve because he values
        my contribution and wants me to succeed, I build different
        meaning than if I tell myself his criticism is a forerunner
        to my getting fired for incompetence. If I see my company
        as a major contributor to solving the energy crisis, I have a
        different feeling about the value of my labor than if I am
        just crunching numbers for someone else’s selfish agenda.
        As the story goes, I feel differently about the meaning of
        my work if I see myself as a bricklayer than if I see myself as
        building a cathedral to God.
          At a corporate level, leaders can help shape and construct
        the meaning employees assign to corporate realities, focusing
        corporate consciousness on opportunities instead of deficits.
        For example, when a corporation faces an industry downturn,
        people generally get nervous. Employees scramble to protect
        their budgets, make their own job perks sacrosanct, and push
        someone else between them and the corporate ax (remember
        Vicki’s story from Chapter 1). But when leaders in one tech-
        nology company made clear to employees that every $50,000
        in savings could save one job, people enthusiastically rallied
        around cost cutting. As a result, employees were engaged,




                                    31
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55