Page 460 - The Mechatronics Handbook
P. 460

0066_Frame_C19  Page 82  Wednesday, January 9, 2002  5:27 PM









                       the resistance of the RTD is high compared to the lead resistance, or where high accuracy is not required.
                       Three wire RTDs, Fig. 19.58(b), allow an equal length of lead wire to be included in each side of the
                       bridge so that changes in lead resistances are felt equally on both sides and the balance of the bridge is
                       not affected. It should be noted that four-wire RTDs of the type shown in Fig. 19.58(d) can be used
                       with readers designed for two-, three-, or four-wire RTDs and unless expense or size is a concern, they
                       are recommended to allow for future upgrades of the reader. A fairly rare alternate configuration of a
                       four wire RTD probe is shown in Fig. 19.58(c) where two of the lead wires form a closed loop. This
                       arrangement usually is needed only when multiple RTDs are in the bridge and should not be confused
                       with the other type of four-wire RTD shown in Fig. 19.58(d), which has two wires going to each side
                       of the resistor.
                         Another problem common to all reading schemes is that of self-heating of the RTD due to the
                       measuring current through the resistor. This can be minimized by using small currents, having a high
                       heat transfer coefficient between the sensor and the measured process, or by using low duty time pulsed
                       measurements. Although steps can be taken to minimize it, self-heating can never be eliminated. It is
                       such a ubiquitous characteristic of RTDs that it can be exploited as a means of determining the heat
                       transfer coefficient of a system, such as when platinum resistors are used as anemometers.
                         As indicated above, the measurement of temperature using an RTD simply requires determining its
                       resistance. The three conventional techniques are briefly discussed here.

                       Fully Balanced Bridges
                       A primitive but highly accurate means of determining the resistance of an RTD is to use it in one leg of
                       a wheatstone bridge and have a calibrated variable resistor in the opposite leg such that when the bridge
                       is brought to balance, as indicated by a null current on a galvanometer, the resistance of the RTD is the
                       same as the calibrated variable resistor. There are several variations on this theme to eliminate most
                       sources of error by splitting the error-forming device between legs of the bridge. For example, if the
                       RTD is remote from the bridge, a three-wire lead configuration can be used to put an equal length of
                       lead wire in both sides of the bridge with the “corner” of the bridge now defined at the remote RTD
                       location as shown in Fig. 19.58(b). Ultimately the accuracy of the reading is limited by the accuracy of
                       the resistances in the bridge, which can be made quite accurate. Since the variable resistor must be
                       physically adjusted to null the bridge, this technique is not readily adapted to data loggers or temperature
                       displays.
                       Unbalanced Bridges
                       If the calibrated variable resistor in the above scheme is replaced by a fixed resistor, the extent of the
                       imbalance of the bridge can be measured with a voltmeter in place of the nulling galvanometer. This
                       technique is fraught with errors since the imbalance of the bridge is not linear with the resistance of the
                       RTD and the reading of the voltmeter is also proportional to the excitation current. Nevertheless, this
                       can be a practical means of measuring temperatures over a narrow range if the values of the resistors in
                       the far legs of the bridge are much higher than the RTD and the opposite leg resistance is close to that
                       of the RTD. As with the other bridge techniques, three lead wires can be arranged in opposite legs of the
                       bridge for remote sensors to compensate for lead resistance changes. If opposite legs of the bridge both
                       consist of RTDs, then the bridge imbalance is proportional to the difference in the temperature of the
                       two RTDs and the only way to keep equal lead lengths in both legs is to use the special four-wire type
                       shown in Fig. 19.58(c).

                       Direct Voltage vs. Current Measurements
                       If a constant current is passed through a resistor, the voltage across it is proportional to resistance. This
                       is a simple concept but had to await the advent of accurate constant current sources and high impedance
                       voltage amplifiers to become a practical replacement to the bridge techniques. By using four lead wires,
                       as shown in Fig. 19.58(d), the current circuit can be made independent of the voltage sensing circuit and
                       the lead resistances have no affect on the reading.



                       ©2002 CRC Press LLC
   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465