Page 105 - Theory and Design of Air Cushion Craft
P. 105

Air  cushion wave-making drag  89


















                                           1.0
                                         Fr,  =v/-JgT c


          Fig.  3.4  C w plotted against  />, for  constant  Z C/5 C.

             breaking wave. The linear assumptions in wave-making theory have to be  replaced
             by nonlinear wave-making theory  at these Fr.
          •  Doctors [21] considered the predicted sharp peaks and troughs at low Fr are caused
             by assuming a uniform pressure distribution,  which implies a step pressure  change
             at the bow and  stern, which clearly is not  reflected in reality. The  sharp  peaks  and
             troughs will disappear  and the theoretical  prediction will agree quite well with  test
             results, when one  assumes the uniform distribution of  pressure inside the  cushion
             is combined  with a  smooth  pressure  transient at the  bow and  stern  (or  the whole
             periphery  for an ACV) with hyperbolic decay to  ambient.
          Since  then,  Bolshakov  has  calculated  the  wave-making drag  of  an  air  cushion  with
          uniform  distribution of  cushion  pressure with a round  bow and  square  stern in hori-
          zontal plane (similar to an SR.N5 or SR.N6). Tatinclaux  [22] has extended these  data
          by calculating  the  velocity potential  and  wave-making of  air  cushions  with uniform
          cushion  pressure  distribution  and  various  plan  shapes  such  as  rectangle,  circle  and
          semicircles. Because the velocity potential used is linear, the potential due to the  com-
          bined plan shapes of  an air cushion  can be obtained by the superposition  of  velocity
          potentials  due  to  the  separate  area  components,  so as  to  obtain  the  corresponding
          total  wave-making drag.
            Comparing  the  coefficients  for wave-making drag  of  air  cushions  of  various  plan
          shapes,  a  rectangular  air  cushion  is found  to  have the  minimum  coefficient,  particu-
          larly  near  hump  speed.  The  rectangular  air  cushion  will  gain more  advantage  if  the
          drag-lift  ratio  RJW  is also  considered.  This  can  be  demonstrated  as  follows;  first,
          define  a  shape  factor for the cushion, which is the  envelope rectangle, divided  by  the
          actual  area,  by which we have
                                          =     B c/S cf
                                        9t   (/ c
          also define  the non-dimensional  cushion  pressure/length  ratio:

                                    p c=
          then
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110