Page 142 - Thermodynamics of Biochemical Reactions
P. 142

7.7 Calculation  of  Standard Transformed  Gibbs Energies of  Formation   139


         Table 7.5   Standard Transformed Gibbs Energies of  Formation for the Catalytic Site
         of  Fumarase in kJ mo1-l  at 25 C and Ionic Strength 0.01 M

                             PH 5       PH  6     PH  7      PH  8      PH 9

         site                - 18.39    - 7.96     - 1.66     -0.19      - 0.02
         succinate          - 576.28   - 553.45   - 530.62   - 507.78   - 484.95
         site-succinate     - 615.86   - 582.23   - 551.35   -525.15   - 501.70
         D-tartrate           114.16    136.99     159.83     182.66     205.49
         site-D  - tartrate   72.45     106.43     138.75     166.52     190.48
         L-tartrate           114.16    136.99     159.83     182.66     205.49
         site-L-tartrate      72.56     106.71     140.02     168.21     191.78
         meso- tart rate      114.16    136.99     159.83     182.66     205.49
         site-meso-tartrate   101.51    133.36     161.52     186.15     209.24

         Source: [With permission from R. A. Albcrty. J. PhJs. Chem. B  104,9929-9934  (2000). Copyright 2000
         American Chemical Society.]
         *This table is based  on the convention  that A[@  = 0 at 25‘C and zero ionic strength for the doubly
         charged ions of D-tartrate. L-tartarate, and meso-lartratc. In addition, the convention is that A,G’” = 0
         for the binding site at high pH.


            The apparent dissociation  constant of the fumarase site-succinate complex to
         yield unoccupied site and succinate is represented by the following function of pH:


                                                                         (7.7-2)

         According to equation 7.1-19, this K’ is given by
                   - RTln K’ = A,G”(site)  + A,G‘O(SUCC) A,G”(site-succ)   (7.7-3)
                                                     ~
         The value of A,Go(succ2-) at 25°C and zero ionic strength is  -690.44  kJ  mol-’,
         and the pH  dependence  of  A,G’o(succ) is given by  -690.44  - 4RTln   (see
         equation  4.4-lo),  neglecting the effect of  the binding  hydrogen  ions at lower  pH
         values.  This  value  is  independent  of  the  ionic  strength  because  2;  = NH(i).
         A,G’”(site) is taken  as zero in the limit of high  pH  by convention so that
                       A,G”(site)  = -RTln(l  + 106.y-pH + 1013.3-2pH 1   (7.7-4)

         Equation 7.7-3 can be written  as
           RTln(1 + i06.9-pH   + 1013.3-2pH  )K‘
                      = -RTln  - 960.44 - 4RTln(lOPPH) - A,G”(site-succ)   (7.7-5)
         Substituting equation 7.6-2 yields

                       A,G”(site-succ)  = - 707.11 - 4RTlr1(10-~~)
                                                  ~
                                         ~  ~   l + 107.5-p~ + 1014.0-~PH  (7.7-6)
                                                                     )
                                                         l
                                                      (
         The values of  A,G”  for the catalytic  site, succinate, and site-succinate calculated
         in  this  way  are  shown  in  Table  7.5.  Similar  calculations  have  been  made  for
         D-tartrate, L-tartrate, and meso-tartrate  using data from Table 7.4. Since the AfGo
         values for these three reactants  are not  known, the convention has been adopted
         that  they  are equal  to zero.  Table  7.5 shows  that  standard  transformed  Gibbs
         energies of formation at specified pH values can be calculated for an unoccupied
         binding site and the binding  site occupied by  a ligand.
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147