Page 33 - Bird R.B. Transport phenomena
P. 33

18   Chapter 1  Viscosity and the Mechanisms  of Momentum Transport


                           "vectors/ 7  Therefore  we  will  refer  to  т  as  the viscous stress tensor (with  components  т,)
                                                                                                    ;
                           and  IT as  the molecular stress tensor (with  components  тг-). When  there  is  no  chance  for
                                                                           /;
                           confusion,  the  modifiers  "viscous"  and  "molecular"  may  be  omitted.  A  discussion  of
                           vectors and tensors can be found  in Appendix  A.
                               The  question  now  is:  How  are  these  stresses  r /;  related  to the  velocity  gradients  in
                           the fluid?  In generalizing  Eq. 1.1-2, we  put several  restrictions on the stresses,  as  follows:
                               •  The viscous  stresses  may be linear combinations  of  all the velocity  gradients:

                                                           dV k
                                               Тц =  — Sjt2/jLt/yjt/  -r-  where  i, , k, and  / may be  1,2,  3  (1.2-3)
                                                                         j
                                Here  the  81  quantities  /x,y W  are  "viscosity  coefficients/ 7  The quantities  x ,  x ,  x 3  in
                                                                                               2
                                                                                             x
                                the derivatives  denote the Cartesian coordinates x, y, z, and  v u  v ,  v 3  are the  same
                                                                                       2
                                as v ,  v yf  v . z
                                   x
                               •  We  assert  that time derivatives  or time integrals  should  not appear  in the  expres-
                                sion.  (For viscoelastic  fluids,  as discussed  in Chapter 8, time derivatives  or time in-
                                tegrals  are needed to describe the elastic  responses.)
                               •  We  do not expect  any  viscous  forces  to be  present,  if  the fluid  is  in a state  of  pure
                                rotation. This  requirement leads  to the necessity  that  r, be  a symmetric  combina-
                                                                               ;
                                tion  of  the velocity  gradients.  By this we  mean that  if  / and; are interchanged, the
                                combination  of  velocity  gradients  remains  unchanged.  It  can  be  shown  that  the
                                only symmetric linear combinations of  velocity  gradients  are
                                                      dVj  dVj\      (dv x  dV y  $V Z
                                                      dx   dxJ       \dX    dy  dZ
                                                        x
                                If the fluid  is isotropic—that is, it has no preferred  direction—then the  coefficients
                                in front  of  the two expressions  in Eq. 1.2-4  must be scalars  so that


                                                                             dy
                                We  have thus reduced the number  of  "viscosity coefficients"  from  81 to 2!
                               •  Of  course, we  want  Eq.  1.2-5  to simplify  to  Eq.  1.1-2  for  the flow  situation  in  Fig.
                                1.1-1. For that elementary  flow  Eq. 1.2-5  simplifies  to т  = A  dvjdy,  and hence the
                                                                              ух
                                scalar constant A  must be the same as the negative  of the viscosity  /JL.
                               •  Finally, by  common agreement  among  most  fluid  dynamicists  the scalar  constant
                                В is  set  equal  to  \i± -  к, where  к  is  called  the dilatational  viscosity. The reason  for
                                writing  В in  this  way  is  that  it  is  known  from  kinetic  theory  that  к  is  identically
                                zero  for  monatomic gases at low  density.
                               Thus  the required  generalization  for  Newton's  law  of  viscosity  in  Eq.  1.1-2  is  then
                           the set  of nine relations  (six being independent):
                                                   dv j  sv\  2      (dv x  dv y  dv
                                                             + {
                                                                                                 "
                                                      +    ) ^    К \   +    +   f            (L2 6)
                           Here Tjj  = Tji, and  i and; can take on the values  1, 2,3. These relations for  the stresses  in a
                           Newtonian  fluid  are  associated  with  the  names  of  Navier,  Poisson,  and  Stokes. 2  If  de-


                                C-L.-M.-H. Navier, Ann.  Chimie, 19,244-260  (1821); S.-D. Poisson, /. Ecole Pohjtech., 13, Cahier  20,1-174
                               2
                           (1831); G. G. Stokes, Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc, 8,287-305 (1845). Claude-Louis-Marie-Henri Navier  (1785-1836)
                           (pronounced "Nah-vyay,"  with the second syllable accented) was  a civil engineer whose specialty was  road
                           and bridge building; George Gabriel Stokes  (1819-1903)  taught at Cambridge University and was  president
                           of the Royal Society. Navier and Stokes are well known because of the Navier-Stokes equations (see Chapter
                           3). See also D. J. Acheson, Elementary Fluid Mechanics, Oxford  University Press (1990), pp.  209-212,218.
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38