Page 246 - Uninterruptible Power Supplies
P. 246

Some System Failures: The Light of Experience!
            244   Chapter Ten


            A Bypassed Radiator
            This failure occurred at a conventional single-set installation having a
            rated output of about 1 MW. The installation was one of many similar
            but not identical installations at various locations spread over the
            United Kingdom.
              On loss of the normal supply the set started and supplied power but
            after a short time tripped out on coolant overtemperature. As in the
            preceding example, the reason was simple but was less easily explained.
            The coolant pipework had been repaired recently and had been installed
            incorrectly; the coolant flow bypassed the radiator!
              This failure probably occurred during a test run but it demonstrates
            the need to conduct a test run after any major work has been completed.

            Lack of Fuel

            This failure is so simple that it barely seems worth recording but it is
            a real-life situation, an example of what actually happens! An impor-
            tant set was regularly tested on load, but when it was required to start
            following a mains failure it went through its multiple cranking sequence
            and registered Fail to Start.
              The daily service tank was not automatically topped up and test runs
            in the past had drained it. There was no other fault. The daily service
            tank should include clear, visible indication of its contents, and its con-
            tents should be checked after each period of running.

            Changeover of Supplies without a Break
            There was a large number of identical small sets installed at locations
            spread over the United Kingdom. Some sites experienced frequent trip-
            ping at the start of test runs whereas others had no such problems.
              It was found that at sites which experienced failures the test proce-
            dure involved starting the standby set, opening the normal supply
            switch, and immediately closing the standby supply switch. At the sites
            which had successful test runs the first two operations were conducted
            in reverse order so that the sequence was to open the normal supply
            switch, start the standby set, and close the standby supply switch.
              At the sites which had successful test runs the starting of the
            standby set ensured a delay between opening the normal supply and
            closing the standby supply. The load at all of these sites included an ac
            electrical rotating machine and the failures demonstrated the need for
            a short delay (a few seconds) to allow magnetic fluxes to decay when
            changing from one supply to another unless the supplies are synchro-
            nized. Some machines will take a very heavy transient current if they
            are connected to a supply while running at or near synchronous speed,



         Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
                    Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
                      Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251