Page 71 - Valve Selection Handbook
P. 71

58                   Valve Selection  Handbook

                Flat seatings (see Figure  3-15a) have the advantage over other types of
             seatings in that they align readily  to  each  other without having to rely on
             close guiding of the disc. Also, if the disc  is moved onto the  seat without
             being  rotated,  the  seatings  mate  without  friction.  The  resistance  of  the
             seating material  to galling is therefore unimportant in this case. Deforma-
             tion of the roundness of the seat due to pipeline stresses does  not interfere
             with the  scalability of the  seatings  as long as the  seat face  remains flat. If
             flow is directed  from  above the  seat,  the  seating faces are protected  from
             the direct impact of solids or liquid droplets travelling in the fluid.
               By  tapering the  seatings,  as shown in Figure  3-15b, c, and d, the  seat-
             ing stress for a given  seating  load can be greatly  increased. However,  the
             seating  load  can  be  translated into higher uniform seating  stress  only if
             the seatings  are perfectly mated; that is, they must not be mated with  the
             disc  in  a  cocked  position.  Thus,  tapered  discs  must  be  properly  guided
             into  the  seat. Also,  the  faces  of  seat  and  disc  must  be  perfectly round.
             Such roundness is sometimes  difficult  to maintain in larger valves where
             pipeline  stresses  may be  able  to distort  the  seat  roundness.  Furthermore,
             as the seatings are tightened,  the disc moves further into the seat.  Tapered
             seatings  therefore  tighten  under friction even  if  the  disc  is  lowered into
             the seat without being rotated. Thus the construction  material  for seat and
             disc must be resistant to galling in this case.
               The  tapered  seatings  shown  in  Figure  3-15b  have  a  narrow  contact
             face,  so  the  seating  stress  is  particularly  high  for  a  given  seating  load.
             However, the narrow seat face  is not capable  of guiding the disc squarely
             into the  seat  to achieve  maximum sealing  performance.  But if the disc is
             properly  guided,  such  seatings  can  achieve  an  extremely high degree  of
             fluid tightness.  On the debit  side, narrow-faced  seatings are more  readily
             damaged  by  solids  or  liquid  droplets  than  wide-faced  seatings,  so they
             are used mainly for gases  free  of solids and liquid droplets.
               To improve the robustness of tapered  seatings without sacrificing seat-
             ing  stress,  the  seatings  shown in  Figure  3-15c  are  tapered  and  provided
             with  wide  faces,  which  more  readily  guide  the  disc  into  the  seat. To
            achieve a high seating  stress,  the  seat  face  in initial contact with the disc
                                          1
            is relatively  narrow, about  3mm ( A in.)  wide. The  remainder  of the  seat-
            bore  is  tapered  slightly  steeper.  As  the  seating  load  increases,  the  disc
            slips  deeper  into the  seat,  thereby  increasing  the  seating width. Seatings
            designed  in  this way  are  not  as readily  damaged  by  erosion  as  the  seat-
            ings in Figure  3-15b. In addition, the long taper of  the disc improves the
            throttling characteristic of the valve.
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76