Page 38 - Visions of the Future Chemistry and Life Science
P. 38

Enzymology takes a quantum leap forward  27



                                 The electronic, rotational and translational properties of the H, D and T
                                 atoms are identical. However, by virtue of the larger mass of T compared
                                 with D and H, the vibrational energy of C–H C–D C–T. In the transition
                                 state, one vibrational degree of freedom is lost, which leads to differences
                                 between isotopes in activation energy. This leads in turn to an isotope-
                                 dependent difference in rate – the lower the mass of the isotope, the lower
                                 the activation energy and thus the faster the rate. The kinetic isotope
                                 effects therefore have different values depending on the isotopes being
                                 compared – (rate of H-transfer) : (rate of D-transfer) 7:1; (rate of H-trans-
                                 fer) : (rate of T-transfer) 15:1 at 25°C.
                                    For a single barrier, the classical theory places an upper limit on the
                                 observed kinetic isotope effect. However, with enzyme-catalysed reac-
                                 tions, the value of the kinetic isotope effect is often less than the upper
                                 limit. This can arise because of the complexity of enzyme-catalysed reac-
                                 tions. For example, enzymes often catalyse multi-step reactions – involv-
                                 ing transfer over multiple barriers. In the simplest case, the highest barrier
                                 will determine the overall reaction rate. However, in the case where two
                                 (or more) barriers are of similar height, each will contribute to determin-
                                 ing the overall rate – if transfer over the second barrier does not involve
                                 breakage of a C–H bond, it will not be an isotope-sensitive step, thus
                                 leading to a reduction in the observed kinetic isotope effect. An alternative
                                 rationale for reduced kinetic isotope effects has also been discussed in rela-
                                 tion to the structure of the transition state. For isoenergetic reactions (i.e.
                                 the reactants and products have the same energy; the total energy
                                 change	0), the transition state is predicted to be symmetrical and vibra-
                                 tions in the reactive C–H bond are lost at the top of the barrier. In this sce-
                                 nario, the maximum kinetic isotope effect is realised. However, when the
                                 transition state resembles much more closely the reactants (total energy
                                 change 
0) or the products (total energy change  0), the presence of vibra-
                                 tional frequencies in the transition state cancel with ground state vibra-
                                 tional frequencies, and the kinetic isotope effect is reduced. This
                                 dependence of transition state structure on the kinetic isotope effect has
                                 become known as the ‘Westheimer effect’.


                                 2.3 A role for protein dynamics in classical transfers

                                 The transition state theory is likely an oversimplification when applied to
                                 enzyme catalysis – it was originally developed to account for gas phase
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43