Page 122 - Water Loss Control
P. 122

104    Cha pte r  Ni ne


                    in this case, major capital expenditure will be involved and long term payback of this
                    capital expenditure has to be taken into account. These two levels of economic opti-
                    mum (firstly, by varying revenue items alone, and then looking at capital expenditure)
                                                                             1
                    are known, respectively, as the short- and long-run economic levels.  The formal econo-
                                  2
                    mists definitions  of these are: “The short run is a period of time in which the quantity of
                    at least one input is fixed and the quantities of the other inputs can be varied. The long
                    run is a period of time in which the quantities of all inputs can be varied, and other new
                    inputs can be introduced.”
                       Examples that are generally quoted, using manufacturing industry, refer to labour,
                    materials, and power as variables that can be changed in the short run, whilst plant
                    capacity can only be changed in the long run.
                       The current thinking on the economic level of leakage (ELL) is based on the knowl-
                    edge that each and every activity aimed at reducing leakage follows a law of diminishing
                    returns; the greater the level of resources employed, the lower the additional marginal
                    benefit which results. This understanding forms the basis of a new methodology in which
                    every activity is analysed in a similar way to compare its marginal cost with that of other
                    interrelated activities, and with the marginal cost of water in that supply zone.
                       This approach can be applied to the four primary activities that impact on leakage
                    control, that is, pressure management, active leakage control (ALC), quality and speed of
                    repairs, and infrastructure improvements, which are often illustrated as shown in Fig. 9.1.
                    To further the comparison with the examples used in manufacturing industry, the ele-
                    ments such as active leakage control and repair activity can be considered to be revenue
                    items and would therefore be considered in the evaluation of the short-run ELL, whereas
                    pressure management and mains rehabilitation would require an investment decision,





                         Losses flex with pressure   Pressure       Economic level of real losses
                                                    management


                                                    Unavoidable
                                                    annual real
                                                      losses
                               Speed and quality                        Active
                                  of repairs                         leakage control
                                                    Potentially
                                                  recoverable real
                                                     losses

                                                   Pipeline and
                                                asset management
                        Current annual real losses  selection,
                                                   installation,
                                                  maintenance,
                                                    renewal,
                                                   replacement

                    FIGURE 9.1  The four primary methods of controlling water losses. (Source: IWA Water Loss Task
                    Force and AWWA Water Loss Control Committee.)
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127