Page 287 - Wind Energy Handbook
P. 287

BLADE DYNAMIC RESPONSE                                                 261


             (7) calculate new deflected profile resulting from this bending moment distribu-
                tion;
             (8) calculate revised estimate of natural frequency from:
                              s ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                                              Trial tip deflection
                       ø9 j ¼ ø j
                                Tip deflection calculated for new deflected profile

             (9) repeat steps (2)–(8) with revised mode shape and frequency until calculated
                mode shape converges.


               It is important to note that the lateral loads and deflections of a centrifugally
             loaded beam do not conform to Betti’s Law, so, as a consequence, the mode shapes
             are not orthogonal. It is for this reason that the ‘purification’ stage has been included
             in each cycle of iteration. When convergence of the calculated mode shape has
             occurred, it will be found that it differs significantly from the ‘purified’ mode shape
             input into each iteration, indicating that a true solution has not been obtained. It is
             then necessary to use a trial and error approach to modify the magnitudes of the
             ‘purifying’ corrections applied until the output mode shape and input ‘purified’
             mode shape match. A few further iterations will be required until the natural
             frequency settles down.
               A quick estimate of the first mode frequency of a rotating blade can be derived
             using the Southwell formula reported by Putter and Manor (1978) as follows
                                              q ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                                         ø 1 ¼  ø 2 1,0  þ ö 1 Ù 2                (5:75)


             in which ø 1,0 is the corresponding frequency for the non-rotating blade. The value
             of ö 1 depends on the blade mass and stiffness distribution, and Madsen et al. (1984)
             suggest the value 1.73 for wind-turbine blade out-of-plane oscillations. In the case
             of Blade TR rotating at 30 r.p.m., this yields a percentage increase in first mode
             frequency due to centrifugal stiffening of 7.7 percent compared to the correct value
             of 8.1 percent. Typically, centrifugal stiffening results in an increase of the first
             mode frequency for out-of-plane oscillations of between 5 percent and 10 percent.
             For higher modes, the magnitude of the centrifugal forces is less in proportion to
             the lateral inertia forces, so the percentage increase in frequency due to centrifugal
             stiffening becomes progressively less.
               The procedure for deriving the blade first mode shape and frequency in the case
             of in-plane oscillations is the same as that described above for out-of-plane
             vibrations, except that the formula for the bending moment distribution due to the
             centrifugal forces has to be modified to:
                                          ð R
                                                  2  r
                               M X:CF (r ) ¼  m(r)Ù r   ì(r)   ì(r ) dr           (5:76)
                                           r          r
             The first mode frequency for in-plane oscillations of Blade TR in the absence of
             centrifugal force is 3.13 Hz. This is approximately double the corresponding
   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292