Page 85 - Wire Bonding in Microelectronics
P. 85

64     Cha pte r  T h ree


                 When a metal (wire) is subjected to a repetitive stress, such as
              bending back and forth, it may eventually fail even though that stress
              is much lower than is required to fracture it in one single bend or pull.
              This is called fatigue. Data on material fatigue are usually given as
              stress versus the number of cycles (S-N) required to cause failure.
              Most wire (bond) fatigue data have been obtained in an accelerated
              manner by mechanically flexing short lengths of wire at some con-
              stant operating temperature (usually room temperature). However,
              field failure conditions are seldom so simple. Power (on/off) and other
              temperature cycling involves various periods of heating, holding at
              temperature for various times, and cooling at various rates. In real
              devices, this thermal cycling flexes the wire, which introduces work
              damage. But, it may also partially anneal that damage during periods
              of continuous high-temperature operation.
                 There has been relatively little actual fatigue data published for
              bonding wires, and much of the data are calculated from other data
              or presented in different forms [3-16, 3-17]. Some use deflection,
              longitudinal strain, stress, etc., without enough information given
              to convert units and directly compare data. That which is available
              can only be assumed accurate for the specific (often unstated, and
              usually proprietary) wire metallurgy that was used in the study,
              typically comparing wire A, B, C. Often the manufacturing process
              (including dopant and annealing) may have changed since the data
              were published. Nevertheless, (very) approximate estimations of
              wire bond life due to fatigue can be made from such generic data.
              The following three S-N curves, Figs. 3-7 to 3-9, are thought to be




                                               Thermal cycle test
                     20
                                               Electromechanical
                                               cycle test
                    Equivalent strain (%)  5
                     10





                      2

                      1
                         10   20     50   100   200    500
                                     Cycles to failure (cycles)
              FIGURE 3-7  The relationship between equivalent strain and the cycles to
              failure for 20 × 350 µm, thermocompression bonded, Au ribbon. The top
              curve results from thermal cycling (−55–85°C), and the lower results from
              mechanical cycling to equivalent displacements [3-18].(© IEEE .)
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90