Page 87 - Wire Bonding in Microelectronics
P. 87

66     Cha pte r  T h ree


                                      Wire diameter (µm)
                                25       51      102        250
                          20
                                 DC burnout current of
                                 wires 0.4" (1 cm) long
                          10
                           8
                           6 4           Gold

                        Burnout current (amps)  2  1.4 mm

                                    Au wire





                                1.3 mm
                           1    Al, 1% Si
                          0.8
                          0.6              Al, 1% Si

                          0.4



                          0.2
                             0.8 1       2       4    6  8 10
                                      Wire diameter (mils)
              FIGURE 3-9  Wire burnout for DC-ramped current measured for 1 cm lengths
              of Au and Al wire of indicated diameter, except for shorter lengths shown by
              black data points.

                 During high-temperature exposure, Al, 1% Si wire may grow large
              silicon aggregates and develop a weak bamboo structure. The Si aggre-
              gates can serve as stress risers (causing cracks) and shortening the
              fatigue life. Because of this, the T-Cy life of such Si-doped Al wire could
              be shorter than its expected life without such long high-temperature
              exposure. Thus, as with Au wire, an accurate value of wire fatigue life
              in a real device is difficult to estimate. A study of fatigue life of several
              specified Al wire alloys was made by Ravi [3-15]. His data are repro-
              duced as Fig. 3-9 and indicate that Al, 1% Mg wire has the superior CF
              fatigue life. (Temperature cycle fatigue was not measured.) He also
              compares the deflection against the actual measured value from a
              working device.  Aluminum wire alloys have changed minimally
              since his work, so the comparison should still be valid, but should be
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92