Page 146 - Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions - M.R. Riazi
P. 146

T1: IML
              P2: IML/FFX
  P1: IML/FFX
                           QC: IML/FFX
                                           June 22, 2007
                        AT029-Manual-v7.cls
  AT029-03
            AT029-Manual
                                                        14:23
         126 CHARACTERIZATION AND PROPERTIES OF PETROLEUM FRACTIONS
         (3.77) and (3.78) as: x P = 3.2574 − 3.48148 SG + 0.011666 m
         and x N =−1.9571 + 2.63853 SG − 0.03992m. Most of the data  get x MA =−0.228 and x PA =−0.025. Since both numbers are
                                                              negative the actual estimated values are x MA = 0 and x PA = 0.
         used in development of Eqs. (3.70)–(3.82) were in terms of  From Eq. (3.85), x A = 0, which is consistent with the previous
         volume fractions for x P , x N , and x A . Therefore, generally esti-  result from Eqs. (3.77), (3.78), and (3.72).
         mated values represent volume fractions; however, they can
         be used as mole fractions without serious errors.    3.5.1.3 API Method
          In all the above equations total aromatic content is cal-  Since 1982 API has adopted the methods developed by Ri-
         culated from Eq. (3.72). As discussed earlier for cases that  azi and Daubert [36, 47] for prediction of the composition
         aromatic content is high it should be split into two parts for  of petroleum fractions. Equations (3.65)–(3.67) and similar
         a more accurate representation of hydrocarbon types in a  equations developed for light fractions in terms of R i and
         petroleum mixture. Aromatics are divided into monoaromat-  VGF by Riazi and Daubert in 1980 [47] were included in
         ics (x MA ) and polyaromatics (x PA ) and the following relations  the fourth edition of the API-TDB-82. However, after devel-
         have been derived for fractions with molecular weights of less  opment of Eqs. (3.70)–(3.74) in terms of viscosity and Eqs.
         than 250 [36]:
                                                              (3.83)–(3.84) for prediction of the amount of different types
        (3.83)  x MA =−62.8245 + 59.90816R i − 0.0248335m     of aromatics in 1986 [36], they were included in the fifth and
                                                              subsequent editions of the API-TDB [2]. The API methods for
        (3.84)   x PA = 11.88175 − 11.2213R i + 0.023745m
                                                              prediction of the composition of petroleum fractions require
        (3.85)              x A = x MA + x PA                 kinematic viscosity at 38 or 99 C and if not available, it should
                                                                                       ◦
                                                              be estimated from Eq. (2.128) or (2.129) in Chapter 2.
         The equations may be applied to fractions with total aromatic
         content in the range of 0.05–0.96 and molecular weight range  3.5.1.4 n-d-M Method
         of 80–250. Based on a data set for aromatic contents of 75  This method requires three physical properties of refractive
         coal liquid sample, Eqs. (3.83)–(3.85) give AAD of about 0.055,  index (n 20 ), density (d 20 ), and molecular weight (M). For this
         0.065, and 0.063 for x MA , x PA , and x A , respectively. Maximum  reason the method is called n-d-M method and is the oldest
         AD is about 0.24 for x PA . Equations (3.83) and (3.84) have not  method for prediction of the composition of petroleum frac-
         been evaluated against petroleum fractions. For heavier frac-  tions. The method is described in the book by Van Nes and
         tions no detailed composition on aromatics of fractions were  Van Westen in 1951 [30] and it is included in the ASTM man-
         available; however, if such data become available expressions  ual [4] under ASTM D 3238 test method. The method does
         similar to Eqs. (3.83) and (3.84) may be developed for heavier  not directly give the PNA composition, but it calculates the
         fractions.
                                                              distribution of carbon in paraffins (%C P ), naphthenes (%C N ),
                                                              and aromatics (%C A ). However, since carbon is the dominant
         Example 3.16—A gasoline sample produced from an Aus-  element in a petroleum mixture it is assumed that the %C P ,
         tralian crude oil has the boiling range of C 5 -65 C, specific  %C N , and %C A distribution is proportional to %P, %N, and %A
                                                 ◦
         gravity of 0.646, and PNA composition of 91, 9, and 0 vol%  distribution. In this assumption the ratio of carbon to hydro-
         (Ref. [46], p. 302). Calculate the PNA composition from a suit-  gen is considered constant in various hydrocarbon families.
         able method and compare the results with the experimental  Errors caused due to this assumption are within the range of
         values.
                                                              uncertainty in experimental data reported on the PNA com-
                                                              position. Another input data required for this method is sulfur
         Solution—For this fraction the only information available  content of the fraction in wt% (%S) and should be known if
         are boiling point and specific gravity. From Table 2.1 the boil-  it exceeds 0.206 wt%. The method should not be applied to
         ing point of n-C 5 is 36 C. Therefore, for the fraction the  fractions with sulfur content of greater than 2%. This method
                             ◦
         characteristic boiling point is T b = (36 + 65)/2 = 50.5 C. The  is applicable to fractions with boiling points above gasoline.
                                                     ◦
         other characteristic of the fraction is SG = 0.646. This is  In addition this method should be applied to fractions with
         a light fraction (low T b ) so we use Eq. (2.51) to calculate
                                                              ring percent, %C R (%C N + %C A ) up to 75% provided that %C A
         molecular weight as 84.3. Since viscosity is not known, the  (as determined from the n-d-M method) is not higher than
         most suitable method to estimate composition is through  1.5 times %C N [7]. The n-d-M method also provides equations
         Eqs. (3.77) and (3.78). They require parameter m, which
                                                              for calculation of total number of rings (R T ), number of
         in turn requires refractive index, n. From Eq. (2.115), I =  aromatic rings (R A ), and number of naphthenic rings (R N )
         0.2216 and from Eq. (2.114), n = 1.3616. With use of M and  in an average molecule in the fractions. The method is
         n and Eq. (3.50), m =−9.562. From Eq. (3.77) and (3.78),  expressed in two sets of equations, one for n 20 , d 20 (20 C)
                                                                                                              ◦
         x P = 0.96 and x N = 0.083. From Eq. (3.72), x A =−4.3. Since  and another set for n 70 and d 70 (70 C) as input data. In this
                                                                                            ◦
         x A is negative thus x A = 0 and x P , x N should be normalized  section correlation in terms of n 20 and d 20 are presented. The
         as x P = 0.96/(0.96 + 0.083) = 0.92 and x N = 1 − 0.92 = 0.08.  other set of correlations for measurement of n and d at 70 C
                                                                                                               ◦
         Therefore, the predicted PNA composition is 92, 8, 0% versus  is given in the literature [7, 24].
         the experimental values of 91, 9, and 0%.
          The aromatic content for this fraction is zero and there             %C A = av + 3660/M
         is no need to estimate x MA and x PA from Eqs. (3.83) and
                                                                               %C N = %C R − %C A
         (3.84); however, to see the performance of these equations
         for this sample we calculate x A from Eq. (3.85). From  (3.86)        %C P = 100 − %C R
         Eq. (2.113), d = 0.6414 and from Eq. (2.14), R i = 1.0409. Us-          R A = 0.44 + bvM
         ing these values of R i and m in Eqs. (3.83) and (3.84), we            R N = R T − R A
                                                                                                                    --`,```,`,``````,`,````,```,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---









   Copyright ASTM International
   Provided by IHS Markit under license with ASTM             Licensee=International Dealers Demo/2222333001, User=Anggiansah, Erick
   No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS  Not for Resale, 08/26/2021 21:56:35 MDT
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151