Page 150 - Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions - M.R. Riazi
P. 150

QC: IML/FFX
                                        T1: IML
  P1: IML/FFX
              P2: IML/FFX
                                           June 22, 2007
                                                        14:23
                        AT029-Manual-v7.cls
            AT029-Manual
  AT029-03
         130 CHARACTERIZATION AND PROPERTIES OF PETROLEUM FRACTIONS
                                   TABLE 3.25—Prediction of sulfur content of petroleum fractions [62].
                                                                                         Error a
                        Fraction type  No. of point  Mol% range  SG range  Sulfur wt% range  AAD%  MAD%
                        Light          76        76–247    0.57–0.86     0.01–1.6     0.09    0.7
                        Heavy          56       230–1500   0.80–1.05     0.07–6.2     0.24    1.6
                        Overall       132        76–1500   0.57–1.05     0.01–6.2     0.15    1.6
                        a AAD% = Absolute average deviation, %; MAD% = maximum average deviation, %.
         well. Similar to sulfur, nitrogen content of various petroleum  Eqs. (2.15) and (3.50) we get R i = 1.0534, m = 1.2195. Since
         fractions is presented in terms of nitrogen content of the  M < 250, Eq. (3.97) is used to estimate the sulfur content as
         crude oil [61]. Ball et al. [65] have shown that nitrogen con-  %S = 1.1% versus the experimental value of 0.8%. Therefore,  --`,```,`,``````,`,````,```,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
         tent of crude oils for each geological period is linearly related  the error is calculated as follows: 1.1%–0.8% = 0.3%.
         to carbon residue of the crude. However, the correlation does  To calculate %C and %H from experimental data, values of
         not provide information on nitrogen content of petroleum  CH = 6.69 with %S = 0.8 are used in Eqs. (3.90) and (3.91).
         products. In general nitrogen content of fractions whose mid  This would result in %C = 86.3 and %H = 12.9. According to
         boiling point is less than 450 C have nitrogen contents less  the general method presented in this book (author’s proposed
                                 ◦
         than that of crude and for heavier cuts the nitrogen wt% in the  method), CH is calculated from Eq. (2.120) as CH = 6.75 and
         fraction is greater than that of crude [61]. However, the value  with estimated value of sulfur content as %S = 1.1, %C and
         of 450 C at which nitrogen content of the fraction is nearly the  %H are calculated from Eqs. (3.90) and (3.91) as %C = 86.1
              ◦
         same as that of crude is approximate and it may vary slightly  and %H = 12.8. In use of Goossens method through Eq. (3.92),
         with the type of the crude. Data reported in Ref. [61] for dis-  estimated values of n, d, and M are required where M should
         tribution of nitrogen content of straight run distillates have  be estimated from Eq. (2.55) as M = 190. For this method %C
         been correlated in the following form:               may be calculated from Eq. (3.88) if %S is known. A summary
                                                              or results for calculation of %H with AD for various methods
               %N 2 in fraction  =−0.4639 + 8.47267T − 28.9448T 2  is given in Table 3.26. The Goossens method gives the high-
                %N 2 in crude                                 est error because all input data required are predicted values.
        (3.99)                + 27.8155T 3                    The ASTM method gives the same value as experimental value
                                                              because the experimental values on all the input parameters
         where T = T b /1000 in which T b is the mid boiling point of the
         cut in kelvin. This equation is valid for cuts with mid boiling  required in Eq. (3.93) are available in this particular example.
         points greater than 220 C and is not applicable to finished  However, in many cases aromatic content or complete distilla-
                             ◦
         petroleum products. Amount of nitrogen in atmospheric  tion curve as required by the ASTM method are not available.
         distillates is quite small on percent basis. The wt% ratio in  The general method of author presented in this section based
         Eq. (3.99) can be replaced by ppm weight ratio for small quan-  on calculation of CH and %S gives good results although 50%
         tities of nitrogen. Estimation of composition of elements is  ASTM distillation temperature and specific gravity have been
         demonstrated in Examples 3.17 and 3.18.              used as the only available data.
                                                              Example 3.18—A petroleum cut has the boiling range of 370–
         Example 3.17—A petroleum fraction with a boiling range of
                                                                 ◦
         250–300 C is produced from a Venezuelan crude oil (Ref. [46],  565 C and is produced from a crude oil from Danish North
               ◦
         p. 360). Experimentally measured properties are as follows:  Sea fields (Ref. [46], p. 353). The nitrogen content of crude
         ASTM distillation 262.2, 268.3, and 278.9 C at 10, 50, and 90  is 1235 ppm. Calculate nitrogen content of the fraction and
                                           ◦
         vol% recovered, respectively; specific gravity 0.8597; carbon-  compare with the experimental value of 1625 ppm.
         to-hydrogen weight ratio 6.69; aniline point 62 C; aromatic
                                                ◦
                                                                                              ◦
         content 34.9%; and sulfur wt% 0.8. Estimate sulfur content  Solution—T b = (370 + 565)/2 = 467.5 C = 740.6K. T = T b /
         of the fraction from the method presented in Section 3.5.2.2.  1000 = 0.7406. Substituting T in Eq. (3.99) gives %N 2 in cut =
         Also calculate %C and %H from the following methods: exper-  1.23 × 1235 = 1525. The percent relative deviation with the
         imental data, Riazi, Goossens, ASTM, Jenkins–Walsh, Bureau  experimental value is −6%. This is relatively a good predic-
         of Mines and Eq. (3.96).                             tion, but normally larger errors are obtained especially for
                                                              lighter cuts.
         Solution—To estimate the sulfur content, parameters M, n 20 ,
         and d 20 are required as the input data. The fraction is a nar-  3.6 PREDICTION OF OTHER PROPERTIES
         row fraction and the boiling point at 50% distilled can be
         considered as the characteristic average boiling point, T b =  In this section, predictive methods for some important prop-
         268.3 C = 541.5 K. This is a light fraction with M < 300;  erties that are useful to determine the quality of certain
             ◦
         therefore, M, d 20 , and n 20 are calculated from Eqs. (2.50) and  petroleum products are presented. Some of these proper-
         (2.112)–(2.114) as 195.4, 0.8557, and 1.481, respectively. From  ties such as flash point or pour point are useful for safety
                              TABLE 3.26—Estimation of hydrogen content of petroleum fraction in Example 3.17.
                        Method    Riazi  Goossens  ASTM D 3343  Jenkins–Walsh  Bureau of Mines  Eq. (3.97)
                        %H, calc.  12.8    12.6       12.9         13.1          13.1        12.7
                        AD,%       0.1      0.3        0            0.2           0.2         0.2
















   Copyright ASTM International
   Provided by IHS Markit under license with ASTM             Licensee=International Dealers Demo/2222333001, User=Anggiansah, Erick
   No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS  Not for Resale, 08/26/2021 21:56:35 MDT
   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155