Page 91 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 91

72                          Life Cycle Assessment of Wastewater Treatment


           4.6  CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION
           The study proposed a waste reuse system that reuses centrate and sludge created from
           sludge thickening to bioenergy and land nutrients. The results showed that the inte-
           grated system could bring environmental benefits as well as impacts. When compared
           with digestion followed by land application, the integrated system improved the envi-
           ronmental performance on fossil fuel use, GHG emissions, eutrophication, and acidifi-
           cation, but increased impacts on ecotoxicity and carcinogens. Decision makers should
           pay more attention to this trade-off when adding treatment facilities to MWTPs.
              The study was just a primary analysis for the integrated waste management of the
           waste streams in an MWTP. A sensitivity analysis should be conducted to identify
           key factors for environmental performance where a strategy for improvement can be
           figured out. As the major benefits were created from the generation of bioenergy, and
           impacts stemmed from land application of digestate, the environmental performance
           can be improved by generating more bioenergy and reducing biosolids for disposal.
           Some feasible technologies that can be considered to further improve the integrated
           system are

              1. Cycling CO  from digestion and injecting it into algae cultivation, which
                          2
                could improve algae yields and remove more nutrients from centrate.
               2. Adding Scum-to-Biodiesel production into the integrated waste manage-
                ment system. More biodiesel could be produced.
               3. Further treating digestate with pyrolysis or gasification or liquefaction
                technology, which could produce more biofuels and reduce biosolids for
                disposal.
               4. Considering other algal biofuel production technologies, such as pyrolysis
                or liquefaction, to increase biofuel yields and therefore improve environ-
                mental performance.


           REFERENCES
           Alba, L. G., Torri, C., Fabbri, D., Kersten, S. R. A., and Brilman, D. W. F. (2013). Microalgae
                growth on the aqueous phase from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of the same microalgae.
                Chemical Engineering Journal. 228, 214–223.
           Anderson, E., Addy, M., Ma, H., Chen, P., and Ruan, R. (2016). Economic screening of renew-
                able energy technologies: Incineration, anaerobic digestion, and biodiesel as applied to
                waste water scum. Bioresource Technology, 222, 202–209.
           Anderson, E., Addy, M., Xie, Q., Ma, H., Liu, Y., Cheng, Y., Ruan, R., et al. (2016). Glycerin
                esterification of scum derived free fatty acids for biodiesel production. Bioresource
                Technology, 200, 153–160. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.018
           Argonne National Laboratory (2011). Life-Cycle Analysis of Algal Biofuel with the GREET
                Model; ANL/ESD/11-5; Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National
                Laboratory: Argonne, IL; http://greet.es.anl.gov/publication-algal-lipid-fuels.
           Asano, T., Burton, F. L., Leverenz, H. L., Tsuchihashi, R., and Tchobanoglous, G. (2007).
                Water Reuse, Issues, Technologies, and Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
           Batan, L., Quinn, J., Willson, B., and Bradley, T. (2010). Net energy and greenhouse gas
                emission evaluation of biodiesel derived from microalgae. Environmental Science &
                Technology, 44(20), 7975–7980. doi:10.1021/es102052y.
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96