Page 478 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 478

9781412934633-Chap-29  1/12/09  4:20 PM  Page 449





                                         CONFLICT AND DIVERSITY: CANADA / QUÉBEC             449


                    they are a minority, the policies of successive  political definition of the linguistic-national
                    governments of Québec have gone in the  space. One presents an instrumental concep-
                    opposite direction. On the one hand,    tion of languages, where they should be at
                    Québec’s nationalist movement, which was  the undifferentiated service of individual cit-
                    at the root of the politicization of the linguis-  izens. The other one presents a more commu-
                    tic issue at the beginning of the 1960s, became  nitarian version, where the promotion of the
                    committed to increasing autonomy, which  language contributes to the cultural project
                    means that it perceived duality (French and  of building a francophone nation within
                    English Canada) less as a characteristic of  North America (Taylor, 1992). They are two
                    the Canadian nation than as an arrangement  regimes which oppose and mutually nullify
                    between two nations (Québec and Canada),  each other. By their promotion of bilingual-
                    each having its own linguistic territory.  ism, the linguistic policies of the federal
                      Furthermore, the linguistic interventions  government directly contradict the efforts of
                    of successive governments of Québec have  the Québec government to make its territory
                    been supported by the general acknowledge-  the only political space in  America where
                    ment that the government of Québec is   the common public language is not
                    the only government with a majority of  English. Paradoxically, the efforts of the
                    French-speakers in its territory, which means  Canadian government, begun following the
                    that Québec has a particular duty to protect  Royal  Commission on Bilingualism and
                    and to promote both the language and    Biculturalism to promote the French lan-
                    societal institutions necessary for it to flour-  guage in order to ensure linguistic equality
                    ish.  This acknowledgement is compatible  among Canadians, ends up opposing the most
                    with the underlying recognition by the   systematic effort to enhance the political
                    Royal Commission on Bilingualism and    prestige of this language by the language
                    Biculturalism, that language and cultural  policies of Québec.
                    community are intimately related and that, in  Conversely, Québec’s language policies,
                    fact, in Canada, sociologically, one of the  developed to a large extent on the basis of a
                    official languages, French, is a minority lan-  sociological acknowledgement of French as a
                    guage. Thus, establishing legislation, even in  minority language in North  America, come
                    Québec, that aims to protect French and, con-  into conflict with the rights of official language
                                                                    32
                    sequently, to limit the presence of English is  minorities. There have even been instances of
                    deemed to be justifiable. It is in this frame-  the Québec government supporting the refusal
                    work that Québec’s principal language laws,  of  Anglophone provincial governments to
                    particularly Bill 101, the French Language  broaden the educational rights of their
                    Charter, have stipulated the clear predomi-  Francophone minorities, apparently on the
                    nance of French in Québec’s territory and  grounds that it would be dangerous if these
                    have spelled out the means of implementation.  expanded minority rights were extended to
                    Even though Québec’s linguistic policy has  Québec’s Anglophone ‘minorities’. An exam-
                    been implemented with more flexibility in recent  ple is Québec’s support for the government of
                    years, the intention of making French the only  Alberta refusing to extend French education
                    public language in Québec is still active. 31  (see: Maheu vs. Alberta, [1990] 1 R.C.S. 342).
                                                              The conflict between the linguistic regimes
                                                            stems from the existence of two national
                    Two linguistic projects, two            projects, the Canadian and the Québecois.
                                                            Each of these projects has a hegemonic claim
                    citizenship projects
                                                            that ends up making it difficult, if not impos-
                    There exist, then, in Canada and in Québec two  sible, to recognize the asymmetry of the
                    linguistic regimes, each proposing a different  linguistic situations. French, while being on
   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483