Page 26 - 3D Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites
P. 26

Manufacture of 30 Fibre Preforms                    15
            The insertion  of  the  weft  yarns  can be done using a number  of  methods.  One of  the
            oldest techniques  consists of transferring a small package of yarn in a holder  (shuttle)
            through the shed, the yarn being drawn out of the shuttle and laid across the warp yarns
            as  the  shuttle  moves.  This  is  a  relatively  slow  technique  but  has  the  advantage of
            creating a closed edge to the fabric, as it is a single continuous yam that is forming the
            fabric  weft.  More  recent,  high-speed  techniques  involve  laying  down  separate weft
            yarns  across  the  fabric  width.  These  weft  yams  are  drawn  through  the  shed
            mechanically  with  a  long  slender  arm  (rapier)  or  pushed  across  with  high-pressure
            bursts of air or water. These processes are faster than shuttle looms, reaching speeds of
            approximately  600 insertions/minute,  but  create a  loose edge of  cut  weft  yarns  that
            needs to be bound together so that the fabric does not fray (salvage).
               The final mechanism  involved in the weaving process  is a comb-like  device (reed)
            that  is  used  to correctly  space the  warp  yarns  across the  width  of  the fabric  and  to
            compact  the  fabric  after  the  weft  yarns  have  been  inserted.  Generally  a  series  of
            positively  driven  rollers  are  used  to  pull  the  fabric  out  of  the  loom  as  it  is  being
            produced and to provide a level of fabric tension during the weaving process. It should
            be  noted  that  the  resultant  fabric  consists  only  of  0"  and  90"  yams,  conventional
            weaving is incapable of producing fabrics with yarns at any other angles and this is one
            of the main disadvantages of weaving over other textile processes.
               Current,  commercial  looms  generally  produce  fabric  of  widths  between  1.8 - 2.5
            metres at production rates of metredminute. The standard weaving process is therefore
            ideally  suited to the cost-effective  production  of  large volumes  of  material.  However,
            using essentially the same equipment, the process described  above can also be used  to
            produce  more  complex,  multilayer  fabrics  that  have yarns  in  the thickness  direction
            linking the layers together.


            2.2.2 Multilayer or 3D Weaving
            The first major difference between conventional weaving and multilayer weaving is the
            requirement  to have multiple  layers of  warp  yams.  The greater  the number  of  layers
            required (and thus the thickness of the preform) or the wider the fabric produced, means
            a  larger  number  of  individual  warp  yams  that  have  to  be  fed  into  the  loom  and
            controlled  during  the  lifting  sequence.  Therefore  the  source  of  the  warp  yarn  for
            multilayer weaving is generally from large creels in which each warp yarn comes from
            its  own  individual  yam  package.  Multiple  warp  beam  systems have  also been  used
            although  this  is  not as common.  This requirement  for  a  large number of  warp  ends
            raises the first disadvantage  of  weaving,  namely that the cost of obtaining (generally)
            thousands of yarns packages  and the time required to set up the large number of warp
            ends within the loom can be extremely expensive. This non-recurring cost becomes less
            significant as the length of the fabric being woven increases but having to weave large
            volumes  of  the  same material  restricts  the  flexibility  of  the process.  Most multilayer
            weaving is therefore currently used to produce relatively narrow width products,  where
            the number of warp ends is relatively small, or high value products where the cost of the
            preform production is acceptable.
               As most  3D composites  are produced from high performance  yarns (carbon,  glass,
            ceramic, etc) standard textile tensioning rollers are unsuitable and tension control on the
            individual yarns during the weaving is critical in obtaining a consistent preform quality.
            This is generally  accomplished  through  spring-loaded  or frictional  tension  devices on
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31