Page 361 - A Comprehensive Guide to Solar Energy Systems
P. 361

366  A ComPRehensiVe Guide To soLAR eneRGy sysTems



             5%. However, recent efforts have improved the efficiency to ∼13%. This has been possible
             with the introduction of undoped ZnO instead of CdS buffer layer and coevaporation of
             Na x se during the CiGs deposition. Further, bifacial CiGs solar cells with both front and
             rear transparent conducting contacts were also investigated [14].
                Molybdenum (Mo), grown by sputtering or e-beam evaporation is the most commonly
             used electrical back contact material for CiGs solar cells. When CiGs is grown on mo an
             interface layer of MoSe 2  is automatically formed which helps in ohmic transport between
             CiGs and mo. Recently, alternative back contact materials have been explored but indus-
             trial production is still based on mo layers. high efficiency cells have p-type Cu(in,Ga)se 2
             bulk while a defect-chalcopyrite Cu(in,Ga) 3 Se 5  phase in the form of thin layer segregates
             at the top surface which is n-type especially when doped by cation atoms diffusing from
             the buffer layer. Several semiconductor compounds with n-type conductivity and band
             gaps between 2.0 and 3.4 eV have been applied as a buffer to form a heterojunction in
             CiGs solar cells. however, Cds remains the most widely investigated buffer layer. TCOs
             with band gaps of above 3 eV are the most appropriate for front electrical contact due to
             their optical transparency (greater than 85%) and reasonably good electrical conductivity.
             Today, CiGs solar cells employ either iTo or, more frequently, RF-sputtered Al-doped Zno.
             one of the breakthroughs in CiGs PV technology was the introduction of potassium [15].
             These observations inspired the development of a post deposition treatment (PdT) which
             led to increased efficiencies of >20% [16–18].































             FIGURE 18.4  Comparing the rate of increase in perovskite solar cell efficiencies with the other thin-film PV
             technologies [19].
   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366