Page 423 - A Comprehensive Guide to Solar Energy Systems
P. 423

Chapter 22 • Life Cycle Analysis of Photovoltaics: Strategic Technology Assessment  433



                 domestically; and for those used in European PV manufacturing, 89% is produced lo-
                 cally and 11% in China. Regarding CdTe PV panels, the two production countries, as of
                 2016, are malaysia and the uSA. The main production countries for CIGS PV are Japan
                 and China. All further upstream steps in the Si supply chain are analyzed considering
                 their actual geographical location—for instance, the production of metallurgical grade
                 Si (mG-Si) is divided among the main global producers, i.e., China, Russia, norway, and
                 the united States.
                   The individual local updated electricity mixes, used for all PV module manufacturing
                 and for the Si supplying countries, are also considered since they influence the amount of
                 PE ultimately required for each production process, as well as the associated environmen-
                 tal impacts.

                 22.4  Current Photovoltaic Life Cycle Analysis Results

                 22.4.1  Fixed-Tilt Ground-Mounted Photovoltaic Systems

                 Leccisi, Raugei, and Fthenakis have recently published a most of up-to-date LCA of the
                 major PV modules installed in fixed-tilt ground mounting utility-scale systems [7]. This
                 section summarizes the finding of their study. Fig. 22.3 shows the CEd of the analyzed PV
                 systems and Fig. 22.4 shows the GWP, both expressed per kW p —the stacked bars show the
                 individual contributions of the main life cycle stages. The average efficiency for each tech-
                 nology is assumed in accordance with the 2016 status report published by the Fraunhofer
                 Institute for Solar Energy Systems [8]—specifically: 17% for sc-Si PV, 16% for mc-Si, 15.6%
                 for CdTe PV, and 14% for CIGS PV. The reader should be aware that these efficiencies con-
                 tinue  to  improve  and,  correspondingly,  the  environmental  indicators  will  continue  to
                 improve as well.
                   The results clearly show that the most impacting step for c-Si technologies is the energy
                 intensive production of SoG Si and cell manufacturing.
                   Fig. 22.3 highlights that, per kilowatt (kW p ), c-Si PV systems are about twice as energy-
                 demanding to produce as CdTe PV systems.
                   Fig. 22.4 illustrates the resulting GWP indicator per kilowatt (kW p ): c-Si PV technologies
                 generally have higher values in comparison with thin film PV panels, and in particular, the
                 lowest GWP values are for CdTe PV.
                   As shown in Fig. 22.5, the EPBTs of the analyzed PV technologies were found to range
                 from 6 months (for CdTe PV installed in the uS South-West) to approximately 2–3 yr (for
                 c-Si PV installed in Central-northern Europe). here yr refers to year.


                 22.5  Technology Roadmaping

                 As shown in the previous section, among the currently commercial technologies c-Si tech-
                 nologies have the highest environmental impact, and the most impacting steps are silicon
                 feedstock and ingot growth, wafering, and cell processing. Thus to provide a paradigm of
   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428