Page 428 - A Comprehensive Guide to Solar Energy Systems
P. 428

438  A COmPREhEnSIVE GuIdE TO SOLAR EnERGy SySTEmS



             Table 22.2  Primary Energy Data Values and Sources
             Process Step               Key Inputs                       Value
             Feedstock                  Poly-Si, Siemens                 545 MJ p  kg −1
                                        UMG-Si                           322 MJ p  kg −1
             Crystallization            CZ-Si electricity use            85.6 kW h kg −1
                                                                                  −1
                                        Quasi-mono Si electricity use    19.3 kW h kg  quasi-mono Si
             Wafering                   Electricity                      Confidential
             Wafering (ion implantation)  Electricity requirement for total process  51.4 kW h m −2
             Cell processing            Plating of contacts              Confidential
                                        IBC-HIT deposition               44.5 MJ p  m −2
             Encapsulation              Solar glass (front 3.0 mm, rear 2.8 mm)  14.6 kg m −2
                                        Conductive back sheet            66.7 MJ p  m −2


                The interpretation of the results is the final stage of the LCA. In addition, because of the
             prospective nature of this study, a thorough uncertainty analysis is required.

             22.6.2  Uncertainty Analysis
             We can distinguish between various sources of uncertainty in LCA [13]; parameter and sce-
             nario uncertainties are the most significant in the current study. These parameters can be
             hard to measure precisely, or precise values might be unavailable, and furthermore, they
             might be inherently variable. Scenario uncertainty is related to the normative choices made
             in constructing scenarios. Another source of uncertainty is modeling uncertainty, which
             comes from the structure of the model. due to its prospective nature, data are subject to
             change in the coming years, and the scenarios that we have developed may not represent
             the actual situation in 2020. An approach to deal with these uncertainties is discussed below.

             22.6.2.1  Parameter Uncertainty
             A prospective LCA study has two major data quality issues: data representativeness (e.g.,
             scaling up from laboratory scale or temporal fluctuations in PE requirements for material
             inputs) and data availability (e.g., confidential or nonexistent data, that therefore have to
             be modeled). The challenge is to quantify these uncertainties in a transparent manner.
             Commonly, a pedigree matrix approach is used, as in the eco-invent database [14]. here,
             the assumption is made that all inputs are accurately described by a lognormal distribu-
             tion. The variance of this distribution is a measure of the uncertainty of the input, and is
             found using a pedigree matrix with data quality indicators (dQI) [13,15]. There are five
             data characteristics on which this variance is based: (1) data reliability, (2) data complete-
             ness, (3) temporal correlation, (4) geographic correlation, and (5) further technical cor-
             relation.

             22.6.2.2  Scenario Uncertainty
             The technological scenarios and performance forecasts that we have made are also sub-
             ject to uncertainty. For instance, cell and module efficiencies might be higher or lower
   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433