Page 110 - Hybrid Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Smart Waterflooding
P. 110

102     Hybrid Enhanced Oil Recovery using Smart Waterflooding

            (A)
                1                                          1

              KRW  0.5                                   KRO 0.5 0

                0                                        -0.5
                1                                          1
                  0.8                             25         0.8                             25
                      0.6                  15  20                0.6                  15  20
                         0.4           10                           0.4           10
                             0.2 0  5                                          5
                       SW             IFT(mN/m)                   SW    0.2 0    IFT(mN/m)
            (B)
                1                                          1

              KRW  0.5                                   KRO 0.5 0

                0                                        -0.5
                1                                          1
                   0.8                            25         0.8                         20  25
                      0.6                  15  20                0.6              10  15
                          0.4       5  10                           0.4       5
                       SW    0.2 0    IFT(mN/m)                   SW    0.2 0    IFT(mN/m)
                FIG. 4.32 The three-dimensional modification of relative permeability as a function of cation exchange and
                IFT reduction in (A) low-salinity water condition and (B) high-salinity water condition. (Credit: From Dang, C.,
                Nghiem, L., Fedutenko, E., Gorucu, E., Yang, C., & Mirzabozorg, A. (2018a). Application of artificial intelligence
                for mechanistic modeling and probabilistic forecasting of hybrid low salinity chemical flooding. Paper
                presented at the SPE Annual technical conference and exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 24e26 September.
                https://doi.org/10.2118/191474-MS.)



          described by a couple of reactions. The partitioning re-  surfactant component, is accumulated at the interface
          action distributes the organic acids between aqueous  of oil and water, and then it reduces the IFT. The IFT
          and oleic phases. The subsequent hydrolysis reaction  reduction introduces the wettability modification as
          produces a soluble anionic surfactant, which is conven-  well as emulsification.

          tionally described as carboxylate, RCOO , in the pres-
                                                                       K w ¼ H þ  OH          (4.23)
          ence of alkali additive. deZabala, Vislocky, Rubin, and
          Radke (1982) schematically depict the reactions                 K D K a ½HA o нOH Š

                                                                     A    ¼                   (4.24)
          (Fig. 4.33). The overall reaction of sodium hydroxide al-            K w
          kali is described in Eq. (4.22).
                                                        where K w is a dissociation constant of water.
                     HA o þ NaOH % NaA þ H 2 O  (4.22)    Low IFT by the in situ soap generation leads to
                                                        formulating the emulsification. Because the stability of
          where HA o indicates the organic acid component of  emulsion depends on the properties of oil and water
          crude oil and A indicates the organic anionic surfactant.  interface, the IFT reduction by the acidic component
            The reaction occurs in the interface between aqueous  of crude oil easily makes the emulsion. The crude oil
          and oleic phases. Recalling the partitioning coefficient  with negligible organic acidic component is hardly
          of Eqs. (3.69) and (3.70), the organic acid components  emulsified with alkali agents because of high IFT. The
          are distributed between aqueous and oleic phases. The  addition of surfactant reduces the IFT of the interface,
          organic acid components in aqueous phase undergo  and then emulsification occurs. The emulsification can
          the hydrolysis reaction following Eqs. (3.71) and  improve the sweep efficiency by blocking the smaller
          (3.72). With the dissociation of water of Eq. (4.23)  pore throat or contribute to the continuous oil bank
          and Eqs. (3.69) and (3.72), the concentration of  in porous media.
          anionic surfactant is calculated with Eq. (4.24).Itis  The alkaline injection has potentials including pre-
          noticeable that the concentration of anionic surfactant  cipitation, adherence to rock surface, and reactions
          is controlled by pH. The surface-active agent, anionic  with mineral and water. Some alkalis such as NaOH
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115