Page 107 - Hybrid Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Smart Waterflooding
P. 107

CHAPTER 4   Hybrid Chemical EOR Using Low-Salinity and Smart Waterflood  99


           (A)                                          (B)
             0.4                                          0.4
               Equilibrium oil-brine contact angle:          Equilibrium oil-brine contact angle:
                  Swi                                           Swi
                  HSWF - 1PV                                    LSWF - 1PV
                  HSWF- Sor                                     LSWF- Sor
             0.3 Average oil-brine contact angle:         0.3  Average oil-brine contact angle:
                  Swi                                           Swi
            Relative frequency  0.2                      Relative frequency  0.2  LSWF- Sor
                  HSWF - 1PV
                                                                LSWF - 1PV
                  HSWF- Sor

             0.1                                          0.1


             0.0                                          0.0
                60  70  80  90  100  110  120  130  140  150  160  50  60  70  80  90  100 110  120 130  140 150  160
                           Contact angle (degrees)                      Contact angle (degrees)
           (C)                                          (D)
            0.40                                          0.4
                Equilibrium oil-brine contact angle:          Equilibrium oil-brine contact angle:
                   Swi                                           Swi
            0.35
                   HSSWF - 1PV                                   LSSWF - 1PV
                   HSSWF- Sor                                    LSSWF- Sor
            0.30  Average oil-brine contact angle:        0.3  Average oil-brine contact angle:
                   Swi                                           Swi
            Relative frequency  0.20  HSSWF- Sor         Relative frequency  0.2
                                                                 LSSWF - 1PV
                   HSSWF - 1PV
            0.25
                                                                 LSSWF- Sor
            0.15
            0.10                                          0.1
            0.05
            0.00                                          0.0
              50  60  70  80  90  100  110  120 130  140 150  160  50  60  70  80  90  100 110  120  130 140  150  160
                           Contact angle (degrees)                      Contact angle (degrees)
                FIG. 4.29 Distribution of in situ contact angle during coreflooding of (A) conventional water flood, (B) low-
                salinity waterflood, (C) high-salinity surfactant flood, and (D) low-salinity surfactant flood. (Credit: From
                Mirchi, V. (2018). Pore-scale investigation of the effect of surfactant on fluid occupancies during low-salinity
                waterflooding in carbonates. Paper presented at the SPE Annual technical Conference and exhibition, Dallas,
                Texas, USA, 24e26 September. https://doi.org/10.2118/194045-STU.)

          importance in the modeling of LSWF mechanism, the  between high and low salinity threshold conditions.
          aqueous reactions, mineral reactions of quartz, K-  In addition, the IFT reduction and wettability modifica-
          feldspar, and calcite, and partitioning reaction of acidic  tion in the mechanisms of surfactant EOR also reduce
          component of oil between aqueous and oleic phases  the residual oil saturation and improve the relative
          are incorporated in the modeling. Extensive mecha-  permeability. The numerical modeling approach on
          nisms are proposed to explain the experimental obser-  the mechanisms of surfactant EOR process modifies
          vation of LSWF as summarized in Chapter 2. This  the residual oil saturation as a function of capillary
          numerical study adapts the wettability modification  number and the relative permeability curves as a func-
          as the mechanism of LSWF, which is modeled with  tion the reduced residual oil saturation. Both mecha-
          the modification of relative permeability and capillary  nisms of LSWF and surfactant flood modify the
          pressure. It is assumed that the wettability modification  relative permeability curves. The simulation of hybrid
          is attributed to the double layer expansion by the total  LSSF also incorporates the salinity-dependent adsorp-
          ionic strength change. Therefore, the total ionic  tion of surfactant, microemulsion viscosity, and
          strength is used as the interpolation parameter modi-  salinity-dependent IFT reduction using solubilization
          fying relative permeability and capillary pressure  ratio and Huh’sequation(Huh, 1979). The numerical
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112