Page 109 - Hybrid Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Smart Waterflooding
P. 109

CHAPTER 4   Hybrid Chemical EOR Using Low-Salinity and Smart Waterflood  101


                         (A)
                            0.4
                               Equilibrium oil-brine contact angle for 100-200 micron pores:
                                   Swi
                                   HSWF
                                   HSSWF
                               Average oil-brine contact angle:
                            0.3    Swi
                                   HSWF
                                   HSSWF
                           Relative frequency  0.2








                            0.1




                              50   60   70  80   90   100  110  120  130  140  150
                                               Contact angle (degrees)
                         (B)
                            0.4
                                Equilibrium oil-brine contact angle for 100-200 micron pores:
                                   Swi
                                   LSWF
                                   LSSWF
                                Average oil-brine contact angle:
                            0.3    Swi
                                   LSWF
                            Relative frequency  0.2
                                   LSSWF








                            0.1




                               50  60   70   80   90  100  110  120  130  140  150
                                                Contact angle (degrees)
                FIG. 4.31 Distribution of in situ contact angle during coreflooding of (A) conventional waterflood and high-
                salinity surfactant flood, and (B) low-salinity waterflood and low-salinity surfactant flood in the pore size on
                the order of 100e200 mm. (Credit: From Mirchi, V. (2018). Pore-scale investigation of the effect of surfactant on
                fluid occupancies during low-salinity waterflooding in carbonates. Paper presented at the SPE Annual technical
                Conference and exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 24e26 September. https://doi.org/10.2118/194045-STU.)
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114