Page 112 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 112

2.4 SPECIFIC ACQUISITION TECHNIQUES                   103

           lithology variations and prediction of rock type  the amplitude, phase and frequency characteris-
           (Allouche et al., 2011).                     tics of P waves, which may result in distinctive
              S wave velocity is almost insensitive to the  anomalies on the seismic data. Fig. 2.57 shows
           pore fluid content such that the reflectivity  an example comparison of P and PS wave seis-
           and velocity of S waves do not change in the case  mic data from a gas cloud through an anticline
           of gas, oil or water saturation. It is possible to  structure. Although the P wave data is affected
           distinguish lithology variations and fluid   by attenuation due to the gas charged sedi-
           changes along a given interface by analyzing  ments, PS wave data provides a clearer
           the lateral changes in reflection amplitudes of  subsurface image.
           P and S waves: P wave amplitude variations
           along the boundaries may be due to both lithol-  2.4.1.1 Ocean Bottom Cable
           ogy or fluid change, however, if the S wave     In ocean bottom cable (OBC) surveys, a single
           reflection amplitude also changes along the  cable (for 2D surveys) or several parallel cables
           boundary, then it possibly indicates a lithology  (for 3D or 4D surveys) containing 2C or 4C sen-
           change (Barkved et al., 2004). These characteris-  sors, typically located at every 25 or 50 m along
           tics are used to define and interpret the direct  the cable, are deployed on the ocean bottom. The
           hydrocarbon indicators (DHI) in the seismic  cables are connected to the recording vessel by
           data. The S wave data typically do not show  an electrical only or electrofiber optic umbilical
           any indication of gas and/or oil contact, fluid  cable for long-distance data transmission and
           saturation effects, etc., while these factors affect  cable control. A source vessel towing an air
































           FIG. 2.57  Comparison of (A) P wave and (B) PS wave prestack depth migration data in depth domain. From Akalin, M.F.,
           Muhamad, A.A., Tan, Y.C., Yusoff, Y.B.M., Radzi, N.A.M., Zohdi, S.F.M., Hashim, M.H., Ghazali, M., Maitra, S., Wardoyo, A.,
           Ghazali, M.L., Murthy, J.V.S., Wang, G., Miao, X.G., 2014. 3D-PS converted waves—solving 3D-imaging challenges under gas
           clouds—offshore Malaysia. In: 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam; Data courtesy of PETRONAS Carigali Sdn. Bhd.
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117