Page 114 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 114

2.4 SPECIFIC ACQUISITION TECHNIQUES                   105


























           FIG. 2.59  Comparison of (A) conventional streamer and (B) ocean bottom cable P wave seismic sections. After Hall, S.A.,
           MacBeth, C., Barkved, O.I., Wild, P., 2005. Crossmatching with interpreted warping of 3D streamer and 3D ocean-bottom-cable data at
           Valhall for time-lapse assessment. Geophys. Prospect. 53, 283–297.

           characteristics due to the more consistent source  and is attached onto an iron frame or anchor
           and receiver positioning (Eriksrud, 2014).   (Fig. 2.60). It is recovered with an acoustic release
                                                        system: On completion of the survey, the device
           2.4.1.2 Ocean Bottom Seismometer             is separated from the anchor by an acoustic
              Oceanbottomseismometers(OBS)aredevices    release and ascends to the surface by sending a
           that contain a 3C seismometer and a hydrophone  coded acoustic signal emitted by the ship’s trans-
           to record long offset seismic or seismological  ducer to the transponder of the OBS. The instru-
           data. They are not permanent devices located  ment also has a radio beacon to be detected by
           on the sea floor, and are typically designed to  the ship’s radar, as well as a flash light and a flag
           work down to 6000 m water depths for a maxi-  for an easy detection and retrieval onboard.
           mum operational period of approximately         OBS systems are commonly used for seismo-
           3months.TheOBSsystemisbuoyantinthewater      logical research by academia and oceanographic


















           FIG. 2.60  (A) Geomar, (B) Sercel, and (C) USGS ocean bottom seismometers.
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119