Page 282 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 282

5.6 GAIN RECOVERY                              273


























           FIG. 5.32  Schematic illustration of various factors affecting the seismic signal amplitude during its propagation. Among
           these, spherical divergence and absorption are of primary importance.

           of these factors affecting the signal amplitude.  will decrease proportionally to 1/r.If A(0) is
           Although the existence of irregularities along  the amplitude at the source and A(r) is the
           the reflective interface, multiple reflections,  amplitude at a distance (r) away from the source,
           energy partition at the interface, and diffractions  then the spherical divergence effect can be
           decrease the amplitude, the spherical divergence  expressed as
           and absorption have a primary effect on the                            1
           amplitude.                                                   ArðÞ ¼ A 0ðÞ           (5.3)
              A shot gather is composed of the wave field                         r
           generated by a single shot, and in a constant  The other principal effect, absorption, on the
           velocity medium, this point source produces a  other hand not only reduces the amplitude but
           spherical wave field. Two principal agents affect  also modifies the frequency content of the signal,
           the characteristics of the signal amplitude. The  and the dominant frequency decays as the signal
           first one is termed spherical divergence and only  propagates (Fig. 5.33C). The effect of absorption
           results in amplitude decay and other character-  can be expressed as
           istics of the signal, such as phase or frequency                        αr
                                                                       ArðÞ ¼ A 0ðÞe           (5.4)
           content, are not affected (Fig. 5.33B). Since the
           acoustic waves propagate as spherical wave   where α is the absorption coefficient and equals
           fronts, the total energy in small surficial areas
                                                                              πf
           indicated by S 1 and S 2 in Fig. 5.32 is equal. How-           α ¼                  (5.5)
                                                                              QV
           ever, because S 1 is smaller than S 2 , the energy
           density is lower in area S 2 . Energy density  where f is the dominant frequency of the signal,
                                        2
           decreases proportionally to 1/r in a homoge-  Q is the rock quality designation (RQD), and V is
           nous medium, where r is the radius of the wave  the wave velocity of the medium. The spherical
           field, while wave amplitude is proportional to  divergence and absorption effects together are
           the square root of energy density, and hence it  known as attenuation and can be expressed as
   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287