Page 378 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 378

7.1 CDP STACK                                369

           when the traces in the CDP gather are summed  multiple and most of the first-order multiple
           up during stacking (Fig. 7.3D). As a real data  amplitudes are suppressed after stacking.
           example, two successive CDP gathers with three  The efficiency of stacking in suppression of
           distinct seabed multiples are shown in Fig. 7.4.  the multiples is directly proportional to the
           After NMO correction with the primary reflec-  number of traces included in the stacking, that
           tions’ velocities (Fig. 7.4B), the multiples still  is, the fold number. In general, the higher the
           remain hyperbolic and out-of-phase while the  fold of the data, the better the suppression of
           primary reflection hyperbolas are flattened to  the multiples by stacking. Fig. 7.6 compares
           become in-phase (Fig. 7.4C).                 24 and 48 fold stack sections. As the maximum
              Fig. 7.5 shows an example marine seismic line  fold increases, a better suppression of the multi-
           to illustrate the suppression of multiples during  ples by stacking is obtained.
           stacking. The brute stack section in Fig. 7.5Ais  In practice, amplitudes in far offsets tend to
           obtained for 1500 m/s constant velocity and  suppress the multiples after stacking, whereas
           has quite distinct multiple amplitudes since  the amplitudes in near offset traces contribute
           the velocity used for NMO correction is also  multiple amplitudes on stack sections (Fig. 7.7).
           the velocity of multiple reflections, resulting  This is because the moveout times between mul-
           in the flattening of the multiples as well as the  tiplesand primariesare significantly low for near
           primaries. Fig. 7.5B illustrates the full stack sec-  offset traces after NMO correction, which makes
           tion obtained using the velocities of primary  them almost in-phase and, when stacked, their
           reflections. Almost all of the second-order  amplitudes strengthen each other, resulting in

































           FIG. 7.4  (A) Two example CDP gathers with three multiple (M) reflections, (B) RMS (red) and interval (blue) velocity func-
           tions of the primary reflections from the location of CDP 442, (C) multiples are still hyperbolic whereas the primary reflections
           are flattened after NMO correction.
   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383