Page 477 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 477

468                      10. NORMAL MOVEOUT CORRECTION AND STACKING















           FIG. 10.8  Various types of anisotropy models. (A) Vertical transverse isotropy (VTI), (B) horizontal transverse isotropy
           (HTI), and (C) orthorhombic symmetry (ORT). VTI and HTI are called transverse isotropy, since the material is essentially
           isotropic in its horizontal or vertical plane.

              regime. The medium is stiffer along the   medium, they create hyperboloids with ellipti-
              fracture directions, resulting in a higher  cal cross-sections for an HTI medium, indicating
              propagation velocity along the cracks     high- and low-velocity directions, which results
              (Fig. 10.8B). The medium is isotropic along  in an inaccurate velocity analysis performed,
              thin vertical planes perpendicular to the  assuming an isotropic subsurface. However, it
              symmetry axis.                            is generally not a straightforward process to
           • Orthorhombic symmetry (ORT): This can be   obtain the anisotropic NMO velocities from
              considered to be the combination of the two  the surface seismic data, which require several
              preceding types with three mutually       elastic parameters to define the anisotropic
              orthogonal planes of mirror symmetry. It is  velocity. Grechka and Tsvankin (1998) showed
              caused by parallel vertical cracks within a  that variations in NMO velocity depending on
              medium of thin horizontal layering        the azimuth are characterized by an ellipse in
              (Fig. 10.8C).                             the horizontal plane, and the axis orientations
                                                        of this ellipse are controlled by the rock proper-
              The existence of anisotropy may distort the  ties and the direction of the reflector normal.
           normal moveout velocity for a small-spread   They have also indicated that at least three azi-
           approximation in a horizontally stratified sub-  muthal measurements are essential to obtain
           surface and results in nonhyperbolic moveouts  the NMO velocity in all azimuthal directions.
           (Tsvankin, 1995), where two-term NMO approx-  Therefore, wide azimuth 3D seismic data is nec-
           imations in Eqs. (10.1) and (10.7) become inaccu-  essary for a complete measurement of azimuthal
           rate with increasing offset, and therefore NMO  anisotropy to construct the azimuthal NMO
           velocities accounting for the anisotropic effects  velocity field. These factors make the anisotropy
           of the subsurface may be considered even for  studies much more complex compared to the
           the case of a single homogenous azimuthally  conventional processing steps, such as velocity
           anisotropic medium. Wallace et al. (2007)    analysis for isotropic media, especially because
           showed that degradation of the reflections in  of the limited azimuths in data recording
           the supergathers after isotropic NMO correction  (Alkhalifah and Tsvankin, 1995).
           is apparent in the far offset traces resorted by  Several different approaches have been sug-
           their azimuths, which is associated with velocity  gested so far to mathematically describe the type
           variations of the azimuth of propagation.    and degree of the subsurface anisotropy.
              Although the reflections produce hyperbo-  Thomsen (1986) defined three parameters, ε, γ,
           loids with circular cross-sections for an isotropic  and δ, to describe the amount of anisotropy of
   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482