Page 298 - Adaptive Identification and Control of Uncertain Systems with Nonsmooth Dynamics
P. 298

Adaptive Estimation and Control of Magneto-Rheological Damper for Semi-Active Suspensions  301


                            Proof. It hasbeen shownin[18,19]thatif   is PE, then the matrix M in
                            (19.12) is positive definite, i.e., its minimum eigenvalue λ min (M)>σ > 0.
                                                                 1
                               We select a Lyapunov function as V = θ  θ. Then one can calculate
                                                                    −1 ˜
                                                                  ˜
                                                                 2
                             ˙ V along (19.12)as
                                                       −1 ˙
                                                               T
                                                    T
                                                                  ˜
                                                              ˜
                                                         ˜
                                               ˙ V = θ   θ =−θ Mθ ≤−μV                (19.15)
                                                   ˜
                                         2σ
                            where μ =         is a positive constant for all t > 0. Then according to
                                      λ max (  −1 )
                            Lyapunov theorem and (19.15), the estimation error θ will converge to zero
                                                                         ˜
                            exponentially.
                               As shown in the above proof, the variable H used to drive the adap-
                                                                                    ˜
                            tive law (19.14) contains the information of estimation error θ,sothat
                            it can drive the estimated parameter θ to converge to its true value in
                                                              ˆ
                            an exponential manner. Moreover, the observer or predictor used in the
                            traditional parameter estimation methods (e.g., gradient method and RLS
                            approaches [23]) are not needed, which leads to reduced computational
                            costs. For more details of this new adaptive law and the performance anal-
                            ysis, we refer to [19,18,22].
                            19.3 ADAPTIVE ESTIMATION AND CONTROL FOR VEHICLE
                                  SUSPENSION WITH MR DAMPER

                            19.3.1 Quarter Car Model and Control Objectives
                            In this section, a non-linear quarter-car model with MR damper will be
                            used to achieve suspension. The diagram of the studied quarter-car system
                            is showninFig. 19.3,where m s is the sprung mass, and m us represents the
                            mass of wheel, respectively. F d and F s are the force produced by the dampers
                            and springs with the damping coefficient b e, the stiffening coefficients of
                            linear and non-linear terms with k s ,k sn. F t and F b denote the elasticity and
                            damping forces of tire with the stiffness and damping coefficients k t ,b f .
                            z s and z us are the displacements of sprung and unsprung masses. z r is the
                            input of road displacement. F is the control force of the semi-active sus-
                            pension system, which is generated by hyperbolic model (19.11).
                               According to Newton’s second law, the dynamics of the studied suspen-
                            sion system shown in Fig. 19.3 are obtained as [14]


                                               m s ¨z s + F s + F d = F
                                                                                      (19.16)
                                               m us ¨z us − F d − F s + F t + F b =−F
   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303