Page 123 - Adsorption, Ion Exchange & Catalysis- 2007, Elsevier - Copy
P. 123

Else_AIEC-INGLE_cH003.qxd  7/13/2006  1:45 PM  Page 119
                  3.4 Slurry Reactors                                     119


                  velocity of the gas phase will be much lower in a fluid of low viscosity than in a liquid of
                  much higher viscosity.
                     gime,
                    For the heterogeneous flow re the Akita–Yoshida correlation deried for b v  ubble
                   oshida,
                  column reactors is proposed (Akita and Y 1973; Ramachandran and Chaudhari,
                  1984; Behkish, 2004; K 1996): oide,
                                                                 2
                                        h         gD   2     18  gD   3      112    u
                               H         G       n     L         L       sG         (3.161)
                                 AY         4                2         0 .. 5
                                      (1   h )  G    
 L      
  L  (   gD )
                  where   n   0.2 for pure liquids and nonelectrolytes, and 0.25 for electrolyte solutions. SI
                  units should be used with this equation. Akita and estigated the ef oshida (1973) in v fect Y
                  of liquid flow for liquid superfelocities up to 0.044 m/s and found that the ef icial v  fect on
                  gas holdup is negligible. Furthermore, Fox and Degen (1990) studied the Fisher–T ropsch
                  synthesis in slurry bubble columns and reported that the effect of liquid flow is important
                  only in systems where foam is present . to have an idea of the effect of liquid flow, the fol-
                  lowing correlation for bubble columns has been given by Hughmark (1967) (Saxena, 1991;
                  Koide, 1996):

                                                        1
                                        h
                                         G                       13
                                                 0.35                       (3.162)
                                             2     u   sG,f       W  L     W  L    
                                                                
                                                     
                                                           
                  where
                                                    u        u   
                                         u    h       sG       sL             (3.163)
                                          sG,f  G         1   h
                                                    h    G,f  G,f    
                  with
                          u  sL    the superficial liquid v elocity
                          h  G,f    the gas holdup in the case of liquid flo . w
                  For batch liquid,  u  sG,f    u  sG  . The subscript “w” in symbols denotes w. SI units ater property
                  are used in this equation. For the deriation of this correlation, air velocities up to 0.305
                   v
                  m/s and liquid velocities up to 0.09 m/s were used. The Hughmark correlation has been
                  derived for the heterogeneous flow regime. In Figure 3.31, the ef fect of liquid flo w on gas
                  holdup for the air–water system is presented.
                    It has been reported that for diameters less than 7.62 cm, the gas holdup depends on the
                  ,
                  column diameter whereas it is independent of it for diameters greater than 10.2 cm
                  (Hughmark, 1967; Saxena, 1991).  The same has been found in studies of the Fisher–Tropsch
                  synthesis in slurry bubble columns, where it has been reported that the effect of the column
                  diameter is negligible when foam is not present in the system (Fox and Degen, 1990).
                    Reilley   et al  . (1986) proposed the following correlation for turbulent bubble columns at
                  ambient conditions (Reilly   et al  ., 1986; Behkish, 2004; Sax 1991): ena,

                                       h  G    0.009 296     u  sG  0.44    L  0.98    
  L  0.16      0.19 G  (3.164)
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128