Page 322 - Advanced Design Examples of Seismic Retrofit of Structures
P. 322

Example of a Steel Frame Building Retrofitted Chapter  5 311


             displacements. Primary and secondary component demands shall be within the
             acceptance criteria for nonlinear components at the selected structural perfor-
             mance level. Modeling parameters and acceptance criteria for nonlinear
             procedures—structural steel components are illustrated in Table 5.12.



             Beams
             Flexural actions of beams shall be considered deformation controlled. Permis-
             sible plastic rotation deformation shall be as indicated in Table 5.12.


             Columns
             Flexural loading of columns, with axial loads at the target displacement
             less than 50% of P CL shall be considered deformation controlled, and maximum
             permissible plastic rotation demands on columns, in radians, shall be as indi-
             cated in Table 5.12, dependent on the axial load present and the compactness
             of the section. As an example, the plastic hinge characteristics of the columns
             and braces of the sports building are presented in Tables 5.13 and 5.14,
             respectively.


             5.7.2.2  Force-Controlled Actions
             Primary and secondary components shall have lower-bound strengths not less
             than the maximum analysis forces. Lower-bound strengths shall be determined
             considering all coexisting forces and deformations.


             Columns
             Axial compressive loading of columns shall be considered force controlled.
                Flexural loading of columns, with axial loads at the target displacement
             greater than or equal to 50% of P CL , shall be considered force controlled and
             shall conform to Eq. (5.31).



             5.8 RESULTS
             5.8.1 Beams With Cradle-Type Connections

             The results of a typical beam with cradle-type connection are shown in Fig.
             5.11. Based on these results for all the beams with cradle-type connection pre-
             sented in Table 5.15, the vulnerability of the beams is determined.
                The loading and hand calculations of the beams in cradle-type connections is
             as follows.
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327