Page 69 - Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles
P. 69

Chapter 3.  Basic gas turbine cycles          45

























               0        10        20        30        40       50        60
                                      PRESSURE RATIO
            Fig. 3.15. Overall efficiencies of several irreversible gas turbine plants (with T,,   = 120O0C).

      the simple recuperative plant. The highest efficiency (with a high optimum pressure ratio)
      occurs for the most complex [CICBTBTXII~ plant, but the graph of efficiency (7)) with
      pressure ratio is very flat at the high pressure ratios, of 30-55 (7) approaches the efficiency
      of  a plant with heat supplied at maximum temperature and heat rejected at minimum
      temperature).
         Finally, carpet plots of efficiency against specific work are shown in Fig. 3.16,  for all
      these plants. The increase in efficiency due to the introduction of heat exchange, coupled
      with reheating and intercooling, is clear. Further the substantial increases in specific work
      associated with reheating and intercooling are also evident.


      3.5. Discussion

         The discussion of  the  performance of  gas turbine plants given in  this chapter has
      developed through four steps: reversible a/s cycle analysis; irreversible a/s cycle analysis;
      open circuit gas turbine plant analysis with approximations to real gas effects; and open
      circuit gas turbine plant computations with real gas properties. The important conclusions
      are as follows:
          The initial conclusion for the basic Joule-Brayton  reversible cycle  [CHTIR, that
          thermal efficiency is a function of pressure ratio (r) only, increasing with t-, is shown to
          have major limitations. The introduction of irreversibility in ah cycle analysis shows
          that the maximum temperature has a significant effect; thermal efficiency increases
          with (T3/T,), and so does the optimum pressure ratio for maximum efficiency.
          The a/s analyses show quite clearly that the introduction of a heat exchanger leads to
          higher efficiency at low pressure ratio, and that the optimum pressure ratio for the
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74