Page 170 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 170

150                                             H  H  O
                                                              H
     CHAPTER 2                                      H
                                                     CH   H
     Stereochemistry,                                  3  H  H
     Conformation,
     and Stereoselectivity
                       Moreover, electron diffraction studies of 3-pentanone indicate the methyl-eclipsed
                       conformation shown below to be the most stable rotamer. 37
                                                         O
                                                    CH 3     CH 3
                                                      H      H
                                                       H    H
                                                  preferred conformation
                                                    for 3-pentanone

                       The pattern, then, is that methyl and unbranched alkyl groups prefer to be eclipsed
                       with the carbonyl group.
                           1,3-Dienes adopt conformations in which the double bonds are coplanar, so as
                       to permit optimum  -orbital overlap and electron delocalization. The two alternative
                       planar conformations for 1,3-butadiene are referred to as s-trans and s-cis. In addition
                       to the two planar conformations, there is a third conformation, referred to as the skew
                       conformation, which is cisoid but not planar. Various types of structural studies have
                       shown that the s-trans conformation is the most stable one for 1,3-butadiene. 38  A
                       small amount of the skew conformation is also present in equilibrium with the major
                       conformer. 39  The planar s-cis conformation incorporates a van der Waals repulsion
                       between the hydrogens on C(1) and C(4), which is relieved in the skew conformation.



                                                         H
                                             H        H
                                          H     H          H     H     CH 2
                                                           H     H     CH
                                                  H                      2
                                           H          H            skew
                                              H
                                                         H
                                           s-trans     s-cis


                           The barrier for conversion of the skew conformation to the s-trans is 3.9 kcal/mol.
                       The energy maximum presumably refers to the conformation in which the two   bonds
                       are mutually perpendicular. The height of this barrier gives an approximation of the
                       stabilization provided by conjugation in the planar s-trans conformation. Various MO
                       calculations find the s-trans conformation to be 2–5 kcal/mol lower in energy than
                       either the planar or skew cisoid conformations. 40  Most high-level MO calculations

                        37	  C. Romers and J. E. G. Creutzberg, Rec. Trav. Chim., 75, 331 (1956).
                        38
                          A. Almenningen, O. Bastiansen, and M. Traetteburg, Acta Chem. Scand., 12, 1221 (1958);
                          K. K. Kuchitsu, T. Fukuyama, and Y. Morino, J. Mol. Struct., 1, 643 (1967); R. L. Lipnick and
                          E. W. Garbisch, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95, 6370 (1973).
                        39	  K. B. Wiberg and R. E. Rosenburg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 1509 (1990).
                        40
                          A. J. P. Devaquet, R. E. Townshend, and W. J. Hehre, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98, 4068 (1976); K. B. Wiberg,
                          P. R. Rablen, and M. Marquez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 8654 (1992); M. Head-Gordon and J. A. Pople,
                          J. Phys. Chem., 97, 1147 (1993).
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175