Page 235 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 235

The strength of CE as an analytical tool is the very high degree of enantioselection  215
          that can be achieved, along with high speed and sensitivity. It is more difficult to use
          CE on a preparative scale, although successful separation has been reported on the  TOPIC 2.2
          milligram scale. 204                                                        Enzymatic Resolution
                                                                                     and Desymmetrization
              We have seen that in each of these means of enantiomeric separation, chiral
          recognition depends upon a combination of intermolecular forces, including electro-
          static attractions, hydrogen bonding, and  -  stacking. These differential interactions
          then lead to distinctions between the properties of the two enantiomers, such as
          chemical shifts in NMR methods or relative mobility in chiral chromatography and
          electrophoresis. There is much current interest in both the analysis of these interactions
          and manipulation of structure to increase selectivity.


          Topic 2.2. Enzymatic Resolution and Desymmetrization

              Enzymatic resolution is based on the ability of enzymes (catalytic proteins) to
          distinguish between R- and S-enantiomers or between enantiotopic pro-R and pro-
          S groups in prochiral compounds. 205  The selective conversion of pro-R and pro-S
          groups is often called desymmetrization or asymmetrization. 206  Note that in contrast to
          enzymatic resolution, which can at best provide half the racemic product as resolved
          material, prochiral compounds can be completely converted to a single enantiomer,
          provided that the selectivity is high enough. Complete conversion of a racemic mixture
          to a single enantiomeric product can sometimes be accomplished by coupling an
          enzymatic resolution with another reaction (chemical or enzymatic) that racemizes the
          reactant. This is called dynamic resolution, 207  and it has been accomplished for several
           -arylpropanoic acids via the thioesters, using an amine to catalyze racemization. 208
          Trifluoroethyl thioesters are advantageous because of their enhanced rate of exchange
          and racemization.

               CH 3        enzymatic hydrolysis       CH 3
                           selective for one enantiomer
            Ar  CSCH CF 3                          Ar  CO H    pure S – enantiomer
                     2
                                                          2
                O                                 +   CH
              racemic       amine racemizes unreacted    3
                            thio ester
                                                    Ar  COSCH CF 3
                                                              2
              The criterion for a successful enzymatic resolution is that one enantiomer be a
          preferred substrate for the enzyme. Generally speaking, the enantioselectivity is quite
          high, since enzyme-catalyzed reactions typically involve a specific fit of the reactant
          (substrate) into the catalytically active site. The same necessity for a substrate fit,
          however, is the primary limitation on enzymatic resolution. The compound to be

          204	  F. Glukhovskiy and G. Vigh, Electrophoresis, 21, 2010 (2000); A. M. Stalcup, R. M. C. Sutton, J. V.
             Rodrigo, S. R. Gratz, E. G. Yanes, and P. Painuly, Analyst, 125, 1719 (2000).
          205	  C. J. Sih and S. H. Wu, Top. Stereochem., 19, 63 (1989).
          206
             E. Schoffers, A. Golebiowski, and C. R. Johnson, Tetrahedron, 52, 3769 (1996).
          207	  S. Caddick and K. Jenkins, Chem. Soc. Rev., 25, 447 (1996); H. Stecher and K. Faber, Synthesis,1
             (1997).
          208
             L. S. Chang, S. W. Tsai, and J. Kuo, Biotechnol Bioeng., 64, 120 (1999); C. Y. Chen, Y. S. Chang, S.
             A. Lin H.-I. Wen, Y.-C. Cheng, and S.-W. Tsai, J. Org. Chem., 67, 3323 (2002); P.-J. Um and D. G.
             Drueckhammer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 5605 (1998)..
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240