Page 451 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
        P. 451
     432               reactions. If the electron density is substantially shared between the two atoms, the
                       structure is bridged. If the electron sharing results in a shift of the donor group,
     CHAPTER 4
                       rearrangement occurs. As we saw in Section 3.4.1, the ethyl cation is bridged. Larger
     Nucleophilic Substitution
                       primary cations rearrange to more stable carbocations; for example, the 1-propyl cation
                       rearranges to the 2-propyl cation and a neopentyl cation rearranges to a t-pentyl cation.
                       These rearrangements are the culmination of electron donation by formation of a
                       new bond.
                                             H        H
                            H                                           CH 3     CH 3
                                      H +                 +  H   H +                   +
                            +             C          H                            H      CH 3
                         H  C  C  H   H       H         C            C   CH 3        C
                         H      H            CH 3     H     CH 3  H     CH 3      H      CH 3
                       bridged ethylium  1-propyl cation rearranges to  neopentyl cation rearranges to
                       carbocation     2-propyl cation by hydride shift  t-pentyl cation by methyl shift
                       Hyperconjugation also makes carbocations susceptible to proton removal, as occurs in
                       elimination reactions. The weakened C−H bond and increased positive charge make
                       hydrogen susceptible to removal as a proton. When we study elimination reactions
                       in Section 5.10, we will find that there is a preference for the removal of the proton
                       from the most highly substituted carbon, which is the one that is most engaged in
                       hyperconjugation.
                                                       :B
                                                  H
                                            H +                 H
                                                C  CH 3               CH 3
                                          CH 3                         H
                                                  H           CH 3
                                           Proton removal leads to alkene formation
                           Within any given series of carbocations, substituents affect stability in predictable
                       ways. ERG substituents stabilize carbocations, whereas EWG substituents destabilize
                       them. Careful attention must be paid to both resonance and polar effects. The resonance
                       effect is very strong for substituents directly on the cationic carbon. Benzylic cations
                       are strongly stabilized by resonance interactions with the aromatic ring. Substituent
                       effects can be correlated by the Yukawa-Tsuno equation. 82  For example, gas phase
                       chloride ion affinities correlate with the Yukawa-Tsuno equation with 
 =−14 0
                       and r = 1 29, indicating a strong resonance interaction. 83  A molecular orbital calcu-
                            +
                       lation estimating the stabilization was done using STO-3G–level basis functions.
                       The electron-donating p-amino and p-methoxy groups were found to stabilize a
                       benzyl cation by 26 and 14 kcal/mol, respectively. On the other hand, electron-
                       attracting groups such as p-cyano and p-nitro were destabilizing by 12 and 20 kcal/mol,
                       respectively. 84
                        82
                          Y. Tsuno and M. Fujio, Chem. Soc. Rev., 25, 129 (1996).
                        83   M. Mishima, K. Arima, H. Inoue, S. Usui, M. Fujio, and Y. Tsuno, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 68, 3199
                          (1995).
                        84
                          W. J. Hehre, M. Taagepera, R. W. Taft, and R. D. Topsom, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103, 1344 (1981).





