Page 392 - Advances in Biomechanics and Tissue Regeneration
P. 392

REFERENCES                                         389

            [37] K.N. Dahl, A.J. Ribeiro, J. Lammerding, Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction, Circ. Res. 102 (11) (2008) 1307–1318.
            [38] M. Crisp, et al., Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex, J. Cell Biol. 172 (1) (2006) 41–53.
            [39] Y. Shibata, et al., Mechanisms determining the morphology of the peripheral ER, Cell 143 (5) (2010) 774–788.
            [40] A. Elosegui-Artola, et al., Force triggers YAP nuclear entry by regulating transport across nuclear pores, Cell 171 (6) (2017) 1397–1410 e14.
            [41] J.L. Allen, M.E. Cooke, T. Alliston, ECM stiffness primes the TGFbeta pathway to promote chondrocyte differentiation, Mol. Biol. Cell 23 (18)
                (2012) 3731–3742.
            [42] Z. Yang, et al., Influence of fibrinogen concentration on mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes chondrogenesis in fibrin hydrogels, J. Bio-
                mater. Tissue Eng. 7 (11) (2017) 1136–1145.
            [43] E. Schuh, et al., Effect of matrix elasticity on the maintenance of the chondrogenic phenotype, Tissue Eng. Part A 16 (4) (2010) 1281–1290.
            [44] P. Sanz-Ramos, et al., Response of sheep chondrocytes to changes in substrate stiffness from 2 to 20 Pa: effect of cell passaging, Connect. Tissue
                Res. 54 (3) (2013) 159–166.
            [45] A.J. Engler, et al., Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification, Cell 126 (4) (2006) 677–689.
            [46] S. Ghosh, et al., In vitro model of mesenchymal condensation during chondrogenic development, Biomaterials 30 (33) (2009) 6530–6540.
            [47] J.S. Park, et al., The effect of matrix stiffness on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in response to TGF-beta, Biomaterials 32 (16)
                (2011) 3921–3930.
            [48] J. Nam, et al., Modulation of embryonic mesenchymal progenitor cell differentiation via control over pure mechanical modulus in electrospun
                nanofibers, Acta Biomater. 7 (4) (2011) 1516–1524.
            [49] I.L. Kim, et al., Fibrous hyaluronic acid hydrogels that direct MSC chondrogenesis through mechanical and adhesive cues, Biomaterials 34 (22)
                (2013) 5571–5580.
            [50] N. Huebsch, et al., Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate, Nat. Mater. 9 (6) (2010)
                518–526.
            [51] S.H. Parekh, et al., Modulus-driven differentiation of marrow stromal cells in 3D scaffolds that is independent of myosin-based cytoskeletal
                tension, Biomaterials 32 (9) (2011) 2256–2264.
            [52] W.S. Toh, et al., Modulation of mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis in a tunable hyaluronic acid hydrogel microenvironment, Biomaterials
                33 (15) (2012) 3835–3845.
            [53] L. Bian, et al., The influence of hyaluronic acid hydrogel crosslinking density and macromolecular diffusivity on human MSC chondrogenesis
                and hypertrophy, Biomaterials 34 (2) (2013) 413–421.
            [54] C.F. Chang, et al., Three-dimensional collagen fiber remodeling by mesenchymal stem cells requires the integrin-matrix interaction, J. Biomed.
                Mater. Res. A 80 (2) (2007) 466–474.
            [55] T. Re’em, O. Tsur-Gang, S. Cohen, The effect of immobilized RGD peptide in macroporous alginate scaffolds on TGFbeta1-induced chondro-
                genesis of human mesenchymal stem cells, Biomaterials 31 (26) (2010) 6746–6755.
            [56] Y.Y. Li, et al., Scaffold composition affects cytoskeleton organization, cell-matrix interaction and the cellular fate of human mesenchymal stem
                cells upon chondrogenic differentiation, Biomaterials 52 (2015) 208–220.
            [57] B. Carrion, et al., The synergistic effects of matrix stiffness and composition on the response of chondroprogenitor cells in a 3D precondensation
                microenvironment, Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5 (10) (2016) 1192–1202.
            [58] M.B. Goldring, K. Tsuchimochi, K. Ijiri, The control of chondrogenesis, J. Cell. Biochem. 97 (1) (2006) 33–44.
            [59] D.P. Burke, D.J. Kelly, Substrate stiffness and oxygen as regulators of stem cell differentiation during skeletal tissue regeneration: a mechan-
                obiological model, PLoS One 7 (7) (2012) e40737.
            [60] S.J. Mousavi, M.H. Doweidar, Numerical modeling of cell differentiation and proliferation in force-induced substrates via encapsulated mag-
                netic nanoparticles, Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 130 (2016) 106–117.
            [61] S.J. Mousavi, M.H. Doweidar, Role of mechanical cues in cell differentiation and proliferation: a 3D numerical model, PLoS One 10 (5) (2015)
                e0124529.
            [62] K. von der Mark, et al., Relationship between cell shape and type of collagen synthesised as chondrocytes lose their cartilage phenotype in
                culture, Nature 267 (5611) (1977) 531–532.
            [63] P.D. Benya, S.R. Padilla, M.E. Nimni, Independent regulation of collagen types by chondrocytes during the loss of differentiated function in
                culture, Cell 15 (4) (1978) 1313–1321.
            [64] D.G. Stokes, et al., Regulation of type-II collagen gene expression during human chondrocyte de-differentiation and recovery of chondrocyte-
                specific phenotype in culture involves Sry-type high-mobility-group box (SOX) transcription factors, Biochem. J. 360 (Pt 2) (2001) 461–470.
            [65] P.D. Benya, P.D. Brown, S.R. Padilla, Microfilament modification by dihydrocytochalasin B causes retinoic acid-modulated chondrocytes to
                reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype without a change in shape, J. Cell Biol. 106 (1) (1988) 161–170.
            [66] P.D. Brown, P.D. Benya, Alterations in chondrocyte cytoskeletal architecture during phenotypic modulation by retinoic acid and dihydrocy-
                tochalasin B-induced reexpression, J. Cell Biol. 106 (1) (1988) 171–179.
            [67] M. Rottmar, et al., Interference with the contractile machinery of the fibroblastic chondrocyte cytoskeleton induces re-expression of the car-
                tilage phenotype through involvement of PI3K, PKC and MAPKs, Exp. Cell Res. 320 (2) (2014) 175–187.
            [68] J. Parreno, et al., Interplay between cytoskeletal polymerization and the chondrogenic phenotype in chondrocytes passaged in monolayer cul-
                ture, J. Anat. 230 (2) (2017) 234–248.
            [69] L. Gao, R. McBeath, C.S. Chen, Stem cell shape regulates a chondrogenic versus myogenic fate through Rac1 and N-cadherin, Stem Cells 28 (3)
                (2010) 564–572.
            [70] B. Sharma, et al., Designing zonal organization into tissue-engineered cartilage, Tissue Eng. 13 (2) (2007) 405–414.
            [71] N.S. Hwang, et al., Regulation of osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in PEG-ECM hydrogels, Cell Tissue
                Res. 344 (3) (2011) 499–509.
            [72] L.H. Nguyen, et al., Engineering articular cartilage with spatially-varying matrix composition and mechanical properties from a single stem
                cell population using a multi-layered hydrogel, Biomaterials 32 (29) (2011) 6946–6952.
            [73] S. Gronthos, et al., Integrin-mediated interactions between human bone marrow stromal precursor cells and the extracellular matrix, Bone
                28 (2) (2001) 174–181.




                                          II. MECHANOBIOLOGY AND TISSUE REGENERATION
   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397