Page 199 - Advances in Renewable Energies and Power Technologies
P. 199

172    CHAPTER 5 DMPPT PV System: Modeling and Control Techniques




                         technique works as follows: when the output voltage v outk of the k-th LSCPVU ex-
                         ceeds a guard level V out lim (V out lim < V ds max ) thus becoming closer to V ds max , the
                         MPPT function carries out an inversion of direction of tracking (direction of
                         decreasing of output power P pank ). Summarizing, when v outk   V out lim , then the
                         MP&O MPPT technique drives the k-th LSCPVU in the direction of increasing
                         output power; instead, when v outk > V out lim , it drives the k-th LSCPVU in the direc-
                         tion of decreasing output power. It is appropriate to adopt a value of V out lim , which is
                         as high as possible to profitably exploit the whole voltage rating V ds max of
                         LSCPVUs’ components. In fact, the adoption of the guard-level voltage V out lim is
                         obviously equivalent, in practice, to the choice of LSCPVUs’ power components
                         characterized by a voltage rating equal to V out lim instead that equal to V ds max ,
                         with V out lim < V ds max . As a rule of thumb, the higher V out lim , the higher the
                         maximum power which can be extracted from the PV systems adopting micro-
                         converters. In fact, as shown in Fig. 5.5, lower values of V out lim lead to systems char-
                         acterized by smaller amplitudes of the optimal range R b with the additional
                         drawback that R b may fall outside the allowed inverter input voltage operating
                         range. In Fig. 5.5, the PeV characteristics of a string of 12 LSCPVUs, which

                         have been obtained by assuming an ambient temperature T ambient equal to 25 C, a
                         distribution S of irradiance values equal to [1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
                                                      2
                         1000 100 100 100 100 100] W/m , and three different values of V out lim (V out
                         lim ¼ 60 V, V out lim ¼ 50 V and V out lim ¼ 40 V) have been reported together with
                         the corresponding ranges R b . In particular, Fig. 5.5A refers to 12 boost-based
                         LSCPVUs and Fig. 5.5B refers to 12 buckeboost based LSCPVUs. The allowed
                         inverter input voltage operating range (evidenced by means of the highlighted region
                         of Fig. 5.5) has been assumed to be equal to [360, 660] V, which is a typical range for
                         H-bridge central inverters (see Fig. 5.2) that are connected to electrical grids char-
                         acterized by an RMS value of the grid voltage equal to 230 V. As shown in Fig. 5.5B,
                         it is evident that when V out lim ¼ 40 V, the optimal range R b becomes a single oper-
                         ating point. Of course, it is also evident that, in general, the considered inverter is not
                         suitable in any of the cases of Fig. 5.5B. The maximum “optimal” value to be















                         FIGURE 5.5
                         PeV characteristics of a string of 12 lossless self controlled photovoltaic units (LSCPVUs):
                         (A) boost-based LSCPVU, (B) buckeboost based LSCPVU.
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204