Page 280 - Aerodynamics for Engineering Students
P. 280

Finite wing theov  263

              For the delta wing b = 2x tan A so that
                                                  LC
                                 1‘ bg dx = 4 tan’ A   x dx = 2c’  tan’ A

              Eqn (5.75) then gives

                                           L
                                  CL =           = 2ir tan A sin a cos a         (5.76)
                                      ipU&cztanA
                The drag is found in a similar fashion except that now the pressure force has to be resolved
              in the direction of the free stream, so that CD oc sin a whereas CL 3; cos a therefore
                                            CD = CL tan a                        (5.77)

              For small a, sin a  tan a N a. Note also that the aspect ratio (AR) = 4 tan A and that for
              small a Eqn (5.76) can be rearranged to give

                                             a=-   CL
                                                27~ tan A

              Thus for small a Eqn (5.77) can also be written in the form

                                                                                 (5.78)


              Note that this is exactly twice the corresponding drag coefficient given in Eqn (5.43) for an
              elliptic wing of high aspect ratio.


                At first sight the procedure outlined above seems to violate d’Alembert’s Law (see
              Section 4.1) that  states that  no net  force is generated by  a purely potential  flow
              around a body.  For aerofoils and wings it has been found necessary to introduce
              circulation in  order  to  generate lift  and  induced drag.  Circulation has  not  been
              introduced in the above procedure in any apparent way. However, it should be noted
              that although the flow around each spanwise wing section is assumed to be non-
              circulatory potential flow, the integrated effect of summing the contributions of each
              wing section will not, necessarily, approximate the non-circulatory potential  flow
              around the wing as a whole. In fact, the purely non-circulatory potential flow around
              a chordwise wing section, at the centre-line for example, will look something like that
              shown in Fig. 4.la above. By  constructing the flow around  the wing in the way
              described above it has been ensured that there is no flow reversal at the trailing edge
              and, in fact, a kind of Kutta condition has been implicitly imposed, implying that the
              flow as a whole does indeed possess circulation.
                The so-called slender wing theory described above is of limited usefulness because
              for wings of small aspect ratio the ‘wing-tip’ vortices tend to roll up and dominate the
              flow field for all but very small angles of incidence. For example, see the flow field
              around a slender delta wing as depicted in Fig. 5.40. In this case, the flow separates
              from the leading edges and rolls up to form a pair of stable vortices over the upper
              surface. The vortices first appear at the apex of the wing and increase in strength on
              moving  downstream,  becoming  fully  developed by  the  time  the  trailing edge  is
              reached. The low pressures generated by these vortices contribute much of the lift.
   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285