Page 94 - Aesthetic Formations Media, religion, and the Sense
P. 94

“More Sexpression Please!”             79

       themselves as culturally inclined and modern middle-class Bangladeshis
       (see Chowdhury 2006). The demands on female bodily comportment,
       however, were not unique to Shima’s in-laws. They are widely shared
       among Bangladeshi religious communities and have been crucial in the
       formation of modern Bengali identity in East Bengal (see Rosario 1992).
         The imagination of a modern Bengali Muslim identity in East Bengal
       was crucially centered on gender difference and class. In the colonial con-
       text, the rise of a Muslim middle class in early twentieth-century Bengal
       took shape within a force field of colonial preoccupations with the position
       of “native” women as well as the interlocking of different communities
       within the colonial arena (Amin 1995; Sarkar 2001). Rahnuma Ahmed
       has shown how the debates in early twentieth-century colonial Bengal pro-
       duced “a consistent modernist position [that] can be identified [among
       middle-class Bengali Muslims] which was based on the theory of progress
       as a meta-narrative: simply put, it stood for freedom from ignorance, from
       religious blindness and superstition, and adherence to what were regarded
       as ‘meaningless’ customs. It argued for the rational re-ordering of nation
       and society, and of the family” (Ahmed 1999, 114). This classic tale of
       modernity’s metanarrative became crucially focused on the position of
       Muslim women, marked in colonial representations as wretched victims of
       seclusion and the decadent lifestyles of polygamous Muslim men. “Middle
       class women writers were near unanimous in singling out porda or seclu-
       sion as the reason for their ‘backwardness,’ for their lack of status and
       power. Seclusion was looked upon as irrational, outmoded and barbaric”
       (115). In colonial Bengal, the participation of middle-class women in pub-
       lic life became a marker of modernity and civilization.

         This new “publicness” of women was however not without its prescriptions:
         Among Bengali Muslims the dismantling of seclusion was accompanied by
         repeated cautioning which urged women not to lose their sense of “shame”
         or “modesty.” Male-female segregation was transformed from a central spa-
         tial division of society to an “inner” feeling; a “bodily” feeling which was
         quintessentially feminine. A redefined sense of shame redrew boundaries
         around sexual propriety and sexual conduct considered appropriate for a
         woman belonging to the respectable class. (Ibid., 117)

       This translated into a particular comportment and dress in the public life
       of Bengali Muslim women. Himani Bannerjee has argued for their Hindu
       counterparts that the Bengali gentle lady, “the moral/aesthetic/erotic con-
       figuration of women of propertied classes in Bengal,” became projected “as
       a visual-moral sign” through their “[a]ppearance, in the sense of body-self
       presentation through clothing” (Bannerjee 1997, 75). Clothing became “a
       moral signifier of her social role and thus of what [was seen] as the culture
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99