Page 196 - Aircraft Stuctures for Engineering Student
P. 196

180  Structural  instability
                               ,ri-
                  1 i1
                                                                    Stiffener  cuts = 1
                                                                 Stiffener  flanges  = 4
                                                                        Skin cuts  = 1
                                                                     Skin  flanges  = -
                                                                                   2
                                                                              9 =a
                           /                 I
                                             I
              j-t  I frt J-L                                     Stiffener  flanges  = 8
                         Cut  not included
                                                                    Stiffener  cuts  = 3
                                                                        Skin cuts  = 2
                                             ~
                                                                     Skin  flanges  = 4
                                                                                  -
                                                                              g 'E
                    I    /           I
                       Cut  not included
             Fig. 6.20  Determination of g for two types of stiffenerkkin combination

             combination  of both. At the moment there is no theory that predicts satisfactorily
             failure in  this  range and we  rely on test data and empirical methods. The NACA
             (now NASA)  have  produced  direct  reading  charts  for  the  failure  of  'top hat',  Z-
             and Y-section stiffened panels; a bibliography  of the results is given by Gerard' '.
               It must be remembered that research into methods of predicting the instability and
             post-buckling  strength of the thin-walled types of structure associated with aircraft
             construction  is a continuous process. Modern developments include the use of the
             computer-based  finite  element  technique  (see  Chapter  12)  and  the  study  of  the
             sensitivity of  thin-walled  structures  to imperfections  produced  during fabrication;
             much useful information and an extensive bibliography is contained in Murray3.






             It is recommended that the reading of this section be delayed until after Section 1 1.5
             has been studied.
               In some instances thin-walled columns of open cross-section do not buckle in bend-
             ing as predicted by the Euler theory but twist without bending, or bend and twist simul-
             taneously, producing flexural-torsional  buckling. The solution of ths type of problem
             relies on the theory presented in Section 11.5 for the torsion of open section beams
             subjected to warping  (axial) restraint. Initially, however, we  shall establish a  useful
             analogy between the bending of a beam and the behaviour of a pin-ended column.
               The bending equation for a simply supported beam carrying a uniformly distribu-
             ted load of intensity wy and having Cx and Cy as principal centroidal axes is
                                       d4v
                                   EI.y.x - w    (see Section 9.1)              (6.65)
                                           =
                                       dz4
             Also, the equation for the buckling of a pin-ended column about the Cx axis is (see
             Eq. (6.1))

                                                                                (6.66)
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201