Page 290 - Aircraft Stuctures for Engineering Student
P. 290

References  271

         The curves  represented  by  Eq. (8.71) may  be  divided  into three  regions.  The first
         corresponds  to  a  very  slow  crack  growth  rate  (<   m/cycle)  where  the  curves
         approach  a  threshold  value  of  stress  intensity  factor  AK,,  corresponding  to
         4 x  lO-”m/cycle,  i.e.  no  crack  growth.  In  the  second  region  (10-8-10-6m/cycle)
         much of the crack  life takes place and, for small ranges of AK, Eq. (8.71) may be
         represented  by
                                du
                                - C(AK)”  (Refs 10, 12)                     (8.74)
                                   =
                                dN
         in which C and n depend on the material properties; over small ranges of da/dN and
         AK, C and n remain approximately constant. The third region corresponds to crack
         growth rates >   m/cycle, where instability and final failure occur.
           An attempt has been made to describe the complete set of curves by the relationship
                              da  -    C(AK)”       (Ref. 13)               (8.75)
                              dN- (1 - R)Kc - AK
         in which K, is the fracture toughness of the material obtained from toughness tests.
         Integration  of Eqs (8.74) or (8.75) analytically or graphically gives an estimate  of
         the crack growth life of the structure, that is, the  number  of cycles required  for a
         crack  to grow from an initial size to an unacceptable  length, or the crack growth
         rate or failure, whichever is the design criterion. Thus, for example, integration  of
         Eq. (8.74) gives, for an infinite width plate for which Q = 1.0




         for n > 2. An analytical integration may only be carried out if n is an integer and Q is
         in the form of a polynomial,  otherwise  graphical or numerical techniques must  be
         employed.





          1  Zbrozek, J. K., Atmospheric gusts  ~  present state of the art and further research, J. R~J.
             Aero. Soc., Jan. 1965.
          2  Cox, R. A,, A comparative study of aircraft gust analysis procedures, J. Roy. Aero. Soc..
             Oct.  1970.
          3  Bisplinghoff,  R.  L.,  Ashley,  H.  and  Halfman,  R.  L.,  Aeroelasticity,  Addison-Wesley
             Publishing Co. Inc., Cambridge, Mass.,  1955.
          4  Babister, A. W., Aircraft Stability  and Control, Pergamon Press, London.  1961.
          5  Zbrozek, J. K., Gust Alleviation  Factor, R. and M. No. 2970, May 1953.
          6  Handbook  of  Aeronautics  No. 1. Structural  Principles and Datu, 4th edition, The Royal
             Aeronautical  Society, 1952.
          7  ESDU Data Sheets, Fatigue, No. 80036.
          8  Knott, J. F., Fundamentals  of  Fracture Mechanics, Butterworths, London, 1973.
          9  McClintock, F. A. and Irwin, G. R., Plasticity aspects of fracture mechanics. In: Fructure
             Toughness  Testing and  its Applications, American  Society for  Testing Materials,  Phila-
             delphia, USA, ASTM STP 381, April, 1965.
         10  Paris, P. C. and Erdogan, F., A critical analysis of crack propagation laws, Trans. An?. Soc.
             Mech. Engrs, 85, Series D, No. 4. Dec. 1963.
   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295